← All shows

Acquired - The Pinterest IPO

Published Apr 23, 2019 · Duration 1:42:59 · Language en · 10 highlights

Summary

这期 Acquired 播客深入讲述了 Pinterest 从失败的移动购物应用 Tote 一路演变为上市公司的完整历程。主持人 Ben 和 David 回顾了创始人 Ben Silverman 在爱荷华州得梅因的成长经历、耶鲁大学的求学,以及他从医学预科转向科技创业的关键转折。故事强调了一系列偶然的机遇和恰逢其时的人物——Evan Sharp 设计出标志性的瀑布流网格布局,Divya 在看电视广告时想出了 Pinterest 这个名字,Ben 的母亲让她的患者们试用产品,而「Pinnit Forward」博主接力活动最终帮助公司找到了产品市场契合点。播客特别指出 Pinterest 与众不同之处在于极早地在增长之前就投资于公司基础设施(财务、HR、文化以及女性工程师团队),这与 Uber、Lyft 等疯狂扩张的独角兽形成鲜明对比。在商业层面,主持人分析了 Pinterest 独特的「发现式」广告定位、它在商业购买流程中的强大位置,以及它作为规模最小的广告平台、用户高度集中于美国女性这一核心风险。关于 IPO,二人认为这家现金充裕、趋于盈利的公司其实更适合做直接上市(DPO),并对其国际化变现能力和来自 Instagram 的竞争威胁做出评级。最后的「Playbook」环节总结了两大教训:在瞄准大市场的同时管理好公司,以及只要还有意愿和资源就绝不轻言放弃、勇于转型。

Chapters

  1. Pinterest 的创立与早期成长故事 0:00–1:00:03

    本节详细讲述了 Pinterest 的创业历程:创始人 Ben Silverman 从爱荷华州德梅因的成长、放弃医学梦想、在谷歌工作后创业,与 Paul Sciarra、Evan Sharp 一起把失败的移动购物应用 Tote 转型为 Pinterest。主持人讲述了公司名字的由来、Evan 设计的标志性瀑布流网格布局,以及通过博主圈子(如 Alt Summit 和 Pinit Forward 活动)找到女性用户群并实现产品市场契合。节目还回顾了 First Mark、Bessemer、a16z、乐天等投资方的融资历程、Sarah 与 Leslie 等女性推动者的贡献,以及公司提前布局基础设施、招募 Facebook 高管和女性工程师。最后谈到公司长期没有收入,直到 2014 年推出 promoted pins,2015 年以 110 亿美元估值走上上市之路。

  2. Pinterest IPO 分析与经验总结 1:00:03–1:42:59

    本节围绕 Pinterest 的 IPO 展开,分析了其用户增长在美国趋于停滞、国际快速增长但变现不足的现状,以及不断增长的收入和接近盈利的财务表现,最终以约 126 亿美元估值上市并首日大涨。主持人对比了 Lyft,讨论了看多与看空观点:Pinterest 在发现与灵感型广告领域独一无二,但市场偏小、用户以女性为主、面临 Instagram 竞争威胁。他们还质疑账上有充足现金却仍募资、本可选择直接上市(DPO)的做法,并在 playbook 环节总结了先建基础设施、飞轮效应、坚持不放弃与保持团队等创业经验。结尾的 carve-out 推荐了 Eugene Wei 关于用区块链框架理解社交网络的访谈,以及 Bill Gurley 和 A-Rod 的内容。

Highlights

  1. He actually says in a talk later that he wants to be known in life for the things that he makes, not the things that he says. Quite in contrast to your typical Silicon Valley unicorn.

    他后来在一次演讲中说,他希望人生因他创造的东西而被人记住,而不是因为他说过的话。这与典型的硅谷独角兽创始人形成了鲜明对比。

    Defines Silverman's unusual founder ethos
  2. He builds a website where you can virtually try on eyeglasses. I don't even know how he did this at the time with whatever web technologies were. Because in like 2014 when Warby Parker rolled it out, it was like, whoa, it's incredible.

    他做了一个可以虚拟试戴眼镜的网站。我都不知道他当时用那些网页技术是怎么做到的。因为到了 2014 年左右 Warby Parker 推出这个功能时,大家还惊呼太不可思议了。

    Surprising: he prototyped Warby Parker years early
  3. Ben Silverman was not the initial CEO of Pinterest. This is just one of those things that ends up buried in the lore. Ben, while the visionary and the person that we chose to start the story with, was not the CEO of the company.

    Ben Silverman 并不是 Pinterest 最初的 CEO。这只是那种被埋没在传说里的事实之一。Ben 虽然是那个有远见、也是我们选择作为故事开端的人,但他当时并不是公司的 CEO。

    Counterintuitive fact most people don't know
  4. So they start getting catalogs and just by hand ingesting the product data into the app. So talk about doing things that don't scale. And this is 2008, there was zero evidence that anyone wanted to do anything that resembled shopping on mobile yet.

    于是他们开始收集各种目录,纯靠手工把产品数据一条条录入到应用里。这就是所谓的「做不可规模化的事」。而这还是 2008 年,当时完全没有任何迹象表明有人想在手机上做类似购物的事情。

    Classic 'do things that don't scale' story
  5. Evan comes up with probably the most important unlock that really makes this happen from a product standpoint. He comes up with the grid layout. Now it doesn't seem all that remarkable, but at the time, this was really novel.

    Evan 想出了从产品角度看可能是最重要的那个突破点——他设计出了网格布局。如今看来这似乎没什么了不起,但在当时,这真的是非常新颖的。

    The key product insight that defined Pinterest
  6. A Dos Equis commercial with the most interesting man in the world comes on, and Divya is like, that's it. That's the name for the company. Pinterest. Because they were talking about pinboards and the most interesting man in the world.

    电视上播了一则 Dos Equis 啤酒「世界上最有趣的男人」的广告,Divya 说,就是它了,这就是公司的名字——Pinterest。因为他们当时正在聊图钉板(pinboard)和「最有趣的」(interesting)男人。

    Memorable, offbeat origin of the name
  7. Ben's mom just starts telling all of her patients to use Pinterest. This is like the equivalent of the Snapchat story where it was Evan Spiegel's cousin who was a high school student and they were using it to message.

    Ben 的妈妈开始让她所有的病人都去用 Pinterest。这就像 Snapchat 那个故事的翻版——当年是 Evan Spiegel 上高中的表亲他们用它来发消息。

    Charming grassroots-growth anecdote
  8. They do this thing called Pinnit Forward, where Victoria will create a pinboard with all the things that mean home to her, and then they tag another blogger and ask the next blogger to do the same. The bloggers get really into it, and things start to turn around.

    他们做了一个叫「Pinnit Forward」的活动,Victoria 会创建一个图钉板,收集所有对她而言代表「家」的东西,然后她再点名另一位博主,请下一位博主做同样的事。博主们非常投入,局面开始扭转。

    The growth hack that found product-market fit
  9. Your average Silicon Valley company at this point would have been like, great, let's pour all this money into growth. To Pinterest and Ben's credit, they said now is the time to pause and build the foundation to support this hyper growth.

    换作一般的硅谷公司,到了这个阶段就会想:太好了,把这些钱全砸进增长里去。但值得称赞的是,Pinterest 和 Ben 却说,现在正是暂停一下、打好基础去支撑这种超高速增长的时候。

    The core strategic lesson of the episode
  10. Pinterest's goal is not to get you to spend more time online. It's to inspire you to do projects offline and take action in the real world. That's not a sound bite he came up with in reaction to Facebook. He's been saying that since 2012.

    Pinterest 的目标不是让你在线上花更多时间,而是激励你去线下动手做项目、在现实世界中采取行动。这并不是他为了回应 Facebook 争议而临时想出的宣传口号——他从 2012 年起就一直这么说。

    Strong contrarian mission vs. attention economy
Full transcript

Oh, the users used to drop by the office. That's so crazy to be. I know, and the woman dressed up as Pinterest for all of you. And oh, here's ornaments for all of you. How many people work at your company? Great. I'll hand make you 25 ornaments. I know, so great. Welcome to season four, episode five of Acquired, the podcast about technology acquisitions and IPOs. I'm Ben Gilbert. David Rosenthal. And we are your hosts.

Today we are talking about a company that is not a social media company. Or is it Pinterest? For context, this is a company that has more users than Snap, though a little bit less than Twitter, is used by 80% of moms in America and is actually a pivot of an early failed mobile shopping app. But we will get into that. Indeed, we will. As always here and acquired. This is episode two of the A-plus IPO saga.

We are proud to be coming at you what two days here after trading. We started trading on Thursday and then yesterday the stock market had the day off. So we've got one day of data here and we'll be of course talking about the entire story of Pinterest, but I had a nice little pop in the market as well that we'll touch on. Yeah, we've got so far we have the PNL of the A+. Indeed.

Indeed. All right, so listeners, today we were talking about a company's exit. And really, that's what we do on every episode of this show. But there are lots of company creation topics that David and I can't help but discuss. And as many of you know, we have a second show for that, the limited partner show. So last week on the LP show, we spent an hour diving into a required topic for every entrepreneur, the term sheet.

We went through line-by-line analyzing each term of a standard series seed term sheet, and of course offering our editorial on each one. If you are interested in hearing us, two non-loyers try to put it in as plain of English as we possibly can, you should definitely consider becoming an LP. And we have a big announcement today as big news on that front. We have heard from a lot of you that you wanted to listen to the LP show, but you weren't sure how it worked.

So we decided to change the sign up and offer every new person who joins a seven-day free trial just so there's no need to take the plunge blind. You can listen right here in the podcast player of your choice in sign up in two taps. Yes, only two taps. By tapping the link in the show notes or going to glow.fm slash acquired. Yes, note the new and official name of the company glow.

and as the person who works on the product behind the LP show, I am selfishly very excited to see how well the new Trials feature works, so please do not be shy to check it out. Yeah, big congrats to Ben and team for getting all that out. Thank you, sir. All right, listeners. Now is a great time to talk about a new partner of ours here on Acquired, LaGora, the agentic operating system that is redefining how the world's best legal teams work.

Yep, it's sort of obvious that AI is going to completely change the legal industry. I bet most of you listening have dropped a contract into some sort of AI chatbot out there. Lugora took that insight and asked the question, what if you really built something with that power from the ground up for the legal industry? So the founders did exactly what great founders do operate with obsessive customer focus. They embedded inside a massive law firm.

for months. They sat with the lawyers just watching how the work really gets done. And that's how you get features that customers love, like tabular review, where you drop in a folder of hundreds of contracts, and it pulls every key term into a grid a lawyer can actually work with. Lagora's bed here is interesting. Since it lets each lawyer handle more complexity, any given person can increase the quality of their work and do higher value work. And this means that the pie can grow even as each individual task takes less time.

And they recently launched LaGora agent offering greater intelligence and performance. The agent lets lawyers set an objective. Then it can handle the planning and the execution and delivery of the final product. Legal teams get to maintain full control and transparency since they're still involved where judgment is required. And LaGora works where you already work. You can use it within Microsoft Word while redlining or drafting. The early LaGora numbers essentially speak for themselves. When they have a head-to-head pilot with their top competitor, they win 70% of the time. LaGora now has over 100,000 lawyers on the platform from 1200 legal teams in 50 countries, and crazily, they went from 1 million to 100 million in ARR in about 18 months. Truly insane numbers. And that is the real test.

Plenty of things demo well, but the question is whether a busy associate actually reaches for it during crunch time or whether a partner trusts it before going into a conversation with a major client. If your legal team wants to check it out, whether you're a law firm or you're in house at a company, you can learn more at logora.com slash acquired and just tell them that Ben and David sent you. All right, David. That is all I have before the illustrious history and facts. We're ready to dive in here. We are.

Well, let's do it. So today, we started our story in the 1980s, mid 1980s, early 1990s. Special time for me probably, probably was a little bit later for you, but for you Ben too. We're all, all of us millennials growing up. And there was another Ben, Ben Silverman.

who was growing up in the middle of the country in Des Moines, Iowa, around this time. And I remember growing up, my parents always used to joke whenever they talk about shipping me off to somewhere random when I was being bad growing up. They'd say, you know, I'm gonna send you to Des Moines. Family Des Moines is a really great place. Man. Anyway, Ben Silverman talks about how it is a really great place and it's going to play a big part in the story here. Have you been to Des Moines?

I have not. No, that's awesome. It looks beautiful. It's actually really awesome. Yeah. Yeah. Is it part of the Quad Cities? Where's it? That is deeper than my knowledge on the area. Yeah, on the Midwest Geography. Okay. Anyway, regardless whether it is or isn't Ben Silverman is growing up there.

around this time, and he is a middle child. He has two sisters, an older sister and a younger sister. He comes from a family of doctors of MDs. Both of his parents are doctors. They are ophthalmologists in Des Moines. His grandparents were doctors, and both of his sisters would go on to become...

Doctors later in life. So Ben thinks, you know, this is basically his destiny. He can't escape this. But he's a, he's a, he's a quiet kid. And he actually says it a talk later that he wants to be known in life for the things that he makes, not the things that he says. Quite, quite in contrast to your typical Silicon Valley unicorn. This is going to be a theme here. Yeah, I was going to say listeners, like Dave and I were chatting before the show.

It actually takes quite a bit of research to find a lot of the best stories about Pinterest because they're very sort of do the work and let the work speak for itself company rather than beaten a drum that many of their other companies do to attract talent and share the spotlight and be in the news a lot. Pinterest just never really had that in their personality. No, totally. I mean, this is probably the most work we had to do researching.

the history of the company and founders, you know, in a long time, not because there aren't great stories here, there are, we're gonna tell them, but, you know, unlike Airbnb or Lyft or Uber, you know, the founders, Ben and Evan and Paul just don't talk about them, but we found them nonetheless. So Ben's growing up and he's quite a kid, likes to, you know, let his work do the speaking and he's very good at work. He's very good student as he would imagine coming from the family that he comes from. He also Supposedly collected stuff hard to verify if this is true or this was this was added as part of the lore later Feeling like I know Ben after watching basically every talk he's given over the last 10 years in the last couple weeks. I actually believe him famously He supposedly had a bug collection, you know, like where you where you'd have a awesome and you would pin bugs on do it I remember I think there was a Calvin and Hobbes Yeah about this yeah So great so Midwest love it so Ben

is a great student Ben Silverman Ben Gilbert was probably also a great student at high school. Silverman though goes to Yale and he does pre-med as he is destined to do. He majors in political science and does pre-med on the side and you know I remember I had tons of friends I was in college right around this time too also do the same you know be pre-med but major and something else and one day though Ben wakes up. It's his junior year and he talks about he just kind of has this feeling that he's been doing pre-med and he's doing well, of course, but he's just not sure that medicine is right for him. Not as destiny. It's not as destiny that he might have thought it was. He's interested in other stuff and in particular, and I can so relate to this because I was in basically the same

moment in my life in history when I went to college. When he went to college was the first time he had his own laptop and his own, you know, dedicated broadband high speed connection to the internet. And he basically fell in love with it. He was like, this is so cool. This is the industrial revolution of our time. And you know, I'm a young person. I see this and he gets access to it in school for the first time.

And he just starts tinkering. He builds a bunch of, you know, what he calls toys with friends while he's in Yale. He builds a website where you can try on eyeglasses. Remember his parents are ophthalmologists and he's in college. He builds this website where that you can virtually try on on eyeglasses. I don't even know how he did this at the time with whatever web technologies were. Yeah, because in like 2014 or whatever, when Warby Parker rolled it out, it was like, Whoa, it's incredible. Yeah, he basically, in Ben's word, be Parker, just a little bit ahead of his time. So he's thinking around with all this stuff and he decides, you know, I think I'm not going to go to med school, at least not right away. And so he goes and he talks to his other friends who were, who were at Yale and also liberal arts majors, but weren't pre-med and asked them, what are you guys doing? And they're like,

We're going to all these consulting interviews and investment baking interviews because that's what you did. And Ben says, okay, cool, I should do that too. He does the whole consulting interview circuit. He ends up getting an offer and joining a consulting firm which I think has been acquired now. I remember these guys corporate executive board. They were based in Washington DC and so he joins them. He moves down to DC after school and two big things happen there. Really important things that are important for the future of Pinterest. One, he gets assigned randomly, I believe, to the IT consulting practice within CDB. He's like, this is a great dial of the internet anyway. I'm gonna work on IT consulting related projects, and he gets really into it. And he starts reading TechCrunch, which had just come out around him. Of course I remember this too. And he's reading about all these startups out in California, like dig and, you know, Yelp was just getting started. This is the web 2.0, down at the web 2.0 era.

And he's like, man, I really kind of want to be a part of this. The other really important thing that happens during his couple years as an analyst at CV, he meets his girlfriend who would become his wife, Divia.

and Divya worked also at CB in the HR Consulting Group, so Ben's in the IT Consulting Group, Divya's in the HR Consulting Group. And as the story goes, one night, they're watching a movie in DC and they watch the Pirates of Silicon Valley, which is, I still have not seen, I need to watch this movie. It's so, I've heard it's so great. It's kind of, it's like, a crime that I haven't watched this movie. I'm not sure if it's more cringe worthy or more like legitimately awesome but it has so much of both that uh yeah I can't believe it was only ever a TV movie. I know and it's about Steve Jobs and Bill Gates and the rivalry between them and Microsoft and Apple highly dramatized in like whatever 90s or early 2000s sort of like camera angles and lighting and it's just so so utterly dramatic.

There's this ridiculous line in there and Ben talked about he gives a talk that I'll reference later where he literally has a slide and he has this this line this quote on the slide There's this super cheesy line in there that I think Bill Gates character says There might be something going on in California And according to them this inspires Him and Divya and they're like, you know, what are we doing in DC? We got to move out to Silicon Valley and be where the action is so they do A little while later, this is 2006, I believe. They move out to Silicon Valley, out to Palo Alto. Ben ends up getting a job at Google in ad operations. Divya gets a job. She wants to work at a startup, so she gets a job at a cool startup right off Calab in Palo Alto. You may have heard of it.

It's called Facebook. She joins them in 2006. She's the first HR member. She was doing HR consulting at CB. She becomes the first HR person at Facebook, which is pretty awesome. And it's also going to have a huge impact on Pinterest. Ben works at Google for a little under two years, I believe. He really wants to do a start. He knows like obsessed with tech crunch. He's tinkering with all sorts of stuff on the side. And every night he's talking to Divya. He's like, ah, what about this? Like I want to work on this. And again, supposedly they're happy.

getting one night and TV is just sick of this. She's working at a startup and she's like, Ben, you know, you might want to just either do this or just stop talking. And I could so imagine this. I'm Jenny and I've had many versions of this conversation and Ben's like, you know what? You're right. So it's fall of 2008 at this point. And he decides he's going to leave Google. He's going to launch his own startup. He's going to live the dream.

He has an idea and he's got a couple of friends that he's gonna work on this company idea with. And he wants to build a website that holds that stores your medical history, your family's medical history. So not like an EMR, but a place where you can store what is your grandparents family medical history, your parents medical history, your siblings, and actually seems really relevant. So it's Fall 2008, he goes off to do this, he quits Google, he walks out, and then a week later.

We remember others' collapses. It's amazing. We'll get back later in the show to how impactful that event was on so many things in the world. I think there's probably four or five episodes now where that's been a turning point in the history of each of these companies. Yeah, totally. And the most direct impact that that has on young Ben Silverman and the company that would become Pinterest.

Is nobody else who he was talking about doing with this ends up leaving. Enjoying full time. I think some some people made him in a Google some people made have been friends. He's he's talked about there were in PhD programs. Everybody's like nope the world's fall apart. Yeah, everybody go to cash keep your job. Don't do anything risky. Yep. And and so Ben's out there. He's all alone. He's he's quit. He's gone. So he goes out and he tries to raise money. He has this idea. This website he wants to build.

but ain't nobody. No angel investors or early stage VCs at that point are investing in like... anything, let alone some random ad apps guy from Google who's a solo non-technical founder. Come on, the bottom is the best time to buy. This is when you should be investing. I can't wait to do the Airbnb episode hopefully later this year where we tell their version of this story, which is also very similar. So he can't raise any money. He has no co-founders, no ability to build a product. He does a bunch of things just to kind of pay the bills and get by. Fortunately, Divya is, you know, working at Facebook and doing pretty well. So she keeps the fledgling family afloat. And they're still well pre IPO at this point. I mean, they hadn't found mobile yet. They hadn't. This is still this is 2008. Facebook's doing well, but it's doing well on venture dollars, not on its real business model.

Yeah, totally. So Ben ends up moonlighting. He helps design a product and a company called Mighty Quiz, which was a Y-combinator company. Were they in the first batch? It wasn't the first, but it wasn't the first, but very early batch. Very early batch. They might have been in the same one as Dropbox. I think Dropbox was in the, was Dropbox in the Reddit batch, because Reddit I think was the first.

Dropbox made it. Yeah, it was it was first two or three years It was definitely early on they powered trivia games for other websites out there Doesn't work of course, but that's how he gets exposed to white comedy. I was always wondering Ben goes back and and he does talks at YC startup school And I was like Pinterest did they do YC didn't do what but that's how Ben became involved with YC He's doing this and he's looking for something to do He he comes upon he realizes, you know, he loves this iPhone and the iPhone SDK had come out earlier that year in 2008, and it just started to open up to third-party applications. Because remember, the first year you're in a half of the iPhone, it was only apps from Apple. There were no third-party apps on this. iPhone OS 2 that had the app store on the SDK. Yeah, and famously, Steve Jobs was against the idea initially of having third-party apps on the iPhone.

But yeah, Bezos style disagreed and committed and they shipped it anyway. Yeah, how different history would have been if that had not been the case. So Ben sees this and he's like, okay, this might be the wave that I can I missed the sort of web 2.0 wave, but this might be the wave that I can ride to build a big company here. And so he hooks up with another friend from undergrad from Yale named Paul Skiara, who very random that Paul would end up becoming his co-founder because Paul lives in New York is also not technical but Paul had a very important aspect to his background in skill set. He knew investors. He had been an associate at a venture capital for radius ventures in New York and he knew investors and what was one thing that they needed money money and Paul of course was also saw the opportunity that.

the opening of the app store would unlock says okay great we're gonna build a company we're gonna build iphone apps they decide to call the company cold brew labs because it sounded cool like listeners we try and pour over like what's the real origin story what's you know this is like this is all we can find like it's that it sounded cool and they just rolled with it.

Yeah, I think that was the actual story. Paul, though, because they need to raise money. Paul has all these investor relationships. They decide it's natural. He should be the CEO of the company. He's in New York, and Ben is out in Palo Alto. He's the CEO, and they decide, well, first they decide what are they going to do to build iPhone apps. Ben has this idea. I actually don't know whether it was Ben or Paul. They come up with this idea for a product that they call TOTE.

And we should pause here before diving into what to is this was like aha moment number one for me doing the research that Ben Silverman was not the initial CEO of Pinterest. I think that David, you even texted me like, whoa, did you realize this? This is just one of those things that ends up buried in the war. That's sort of super fun when we're diving in and trying to figure out what's going on. Ben, while the sort of visionary and the person that we chose to start the story with and in his upbringing was not the CEO of the company. And despite having left his job at Google earlier and been searching around for a company to start.

They decide that they're going to build this this app called tote and release it on the app store. How did they got the idea for this? I don't know. The idea is that you get all these paper catalogs, you know, direct mail catalogs sent to you in the mail for all sorts of things, you know, fashion, home decor, you know, pottery barn, what have you. Wouldn't it be interesting if instead of getting those in the mail, you could get them on your new smartphone device. David, that is just what I want. And just what I want. Oh, man, I can't wait to read more catalogs. And so they just say they're going to do this. But there's no like API for, you know, getting products and catalogs from companies. So they start getting catalogs and just like by hand, ingesting the product data into into the app, like typing in like, Oh, here's this, you know, dress at

for every 21, it's priced at this, like, take a picture of it, here's the picture. So talk about doing things that don't scale. And this is 2008, like, there was zero evidence that anyone wanted to do anything that resembled shopping on mobile yet. Yep, end of 2008 beginning of 2009. They, so they think, okay, we've got this great idea. We're working on this product now. We're gonna go out and we're gonna raise money with, you know, our new great VC connections.

Everybody turns them down. They meet with like everybody in Silicon Valley people more or less laugh them out of the room rightly so at that point in time so they get so desperate This is this is later on in the spring and actually David I'll push you on rightly so because if they had invested they would have been the first investor in Pinterest So it is interesting. It's like rightly so on rightly so for this idea. Yes Well, and that's the that's the art of of early stage investing Which we'll we'll get into more as we go here. So they're so desperate for money to pay the bills that they start applying to business plan competitions at colleges that they didn't even go to. They're just doing anything to try and get some money. And presumably also some money to pay some developers to actually build this because they can't build this. According to Ben, they go to several. They go to one, I believe this was NYU. I couldn't verify, but I believe this was NYU's business plan competition. They end up getting second place in the competition. So they don't get any prize money.

but what they get for coming in second is a meeting with a VC. And that VC happens to be a VC in New York, a brand new firm that has just gotten started at this point in time, which I know must have been incredibly difficult to start and raise a first time fund in the middle of 2008, 2009.

man, it was hard enough doing it at Wave in 2017, 2018. And David, to double down on that, imagine how hard that is, you're an early firm. You're making one of your first few investments and it's Pinterest. Yeah, exactly. Well, so these guys, first mark capital, which is now great, much larger VC firm based in New York, they just got started. They were the second place door prize in this competition. And so they meet with Paul and Ben and this app called Toe and for whatever reason they take a shine to them and they say, okay, great. What are you guys a couple hundred K? Like let's see what you do with this. So first mark becomes the first institutional investor in cold brew labs. You can read the the form D that gets filed. Paul signs it as the CEO of the company. They invest a couple hundred K. And we do this part later, but just to sprinkle some numbers on this Pinterest.

Their IPO price was at $19 a share and when they opened trading, it was at almost 24 bucks a share. These shares were bought for one cent per share. Yeah, so they do pretty well. And I believe first mark still owns about 99% of Pinterest. Man, the art of early stage venture capital and betting on teams. Great investment there. With these resources, they are some developers, the ship, the app.

but nobody really uses it because, you know, again, who wants to really be shopping catalogs on your, at that point in time, 3.5 inch iPhone screen. There's a few things there, it's like no one was conditioned to that behavior yet.

phones weren't rich enough and their functionality to sort of give you the confidence that doing things like shopping or booking travel or anything on them was actually gonna work. And you had sort of the richness of the software required to do those things. At this point in time, you had 3G, I think you were past the edge days of the iPhone, but loading high quality images still took a while. Totally. This was the era where trying to update your app took two weeks. Any time that anything was wrong, it's not like that we have sort of the number one, the update speed that we have today, but number two, the ability to change a lot of stuff on the server. I think the apps weren't that sophisticated yet and had just a lot of really heavy stuff on the client side. And so I think that not only was there only a small segment of people willing to do this crazy thing called shop on their phone, but then even more so it was really hard to actually iterate on this thing. Yep. Hard on all fronts. So one day later on, a couple months later in 2009,

Ben is visiting New York. I assume his business because Paul is still there. And a mutual friend says to Ben, Hey, there's this guy here. I know that I'm also friends with you guys seem really similar. Like you should just like grab a drink. I think you would really like each other and meet while you're in town. The friend he that the mutual friend was talking about is a architecture grad student named Evan Sharp.

And the interest really keeps finding the exact right people for these roles with just the right backgrounds. Exactly. People at the right time. As with all of these stories, it's so funny when you dig into them, you know, the number of just random events that lead to these incredible.

stories and companies being created. You know, at the same thing with the Lyft co-founders meeting on Facebook. So Evan was, he had an architecture background, but he actually had some super applicable skills from tech companies, right? Not yet. Not yet. So he's just an architecture grad student in New York. Ben and Evan grab a drink. They're chatting and Evan's, you know, saying like he has talking about how he loves, you know, he's so into architecture and design, and he's curated. He has thousands of architectural photos and drawings and designs that he's saved online. But it's so hard to keep them organized and he's got this whole system. And they're riffing in bed. He's like, oh yeah, I love collecting things too. I have a bug collection. Yeah, I had a bug collection. And I've had this idea of I love tinkering with stuff. And one of the things I'd always wanted to build is a product that would let you collect.

things online and save them and organize them. And they start riffing, you know, and eventually, Ben's like, man, like, we're really, we're really insane. You should come join me and Paul at Cold Brew and like, work on what we're working on on Tote. And like, maybe we can, maybe we can move the product in this direction. Evan though, you know, he's still in grad school and he's super passionate about architecture and design. And he does want to work in tech. He wants to be a product designer, but he's not super interested in, uh, really early stage start-up that doesn't have a lot of great prospects. So, in fact, what he's interested in, and I don't know if he already had this lined up, but when he graduates from architecture school, he goes and he works at Facebook as a product designer. But he's like, you know, I like you guys.

I don't think I want to do this full-time and drop out of school, but I'll work with you on the side. And if he didn't have the job at Facebook yet, I imagine this helps him in his interview process, that he's working on the side with a startup that would become Pinterest. So they all start working together, and there was along the same vein, Tote did have this feature that they already had in there that let people save items for later, that they were browsing in the catalog, and the very few people who were using Tote They all seem to be using that, and as when they talk to users, they seem to kind of like it. You know, and it makes sense, I was talking with, with my wife Jenny about, you know, what...

she uses Pinterest for these days and likes it and you know the analogy that she said to me is you know Pinterest is like the online version of when you're reading a magazine and you see something interesting and you tear the page out or you fold the page down to save it for later and that's literally what was happening in to and so they decide to focus on that and and build out this feature a little more and they combine it with you know sort of this broader idea like okay let's get beyond just shopping and catalogs, but kind of organizing everything that you come across on the internet. So Evan designs it in his free time and he comes up with probably the most important unlock that really makes this happen from a product standpoint. He comes up with the grid layout. Now it doesn't seem all that remarkable. You go to Pinterest and everything is laid out in a grid of images. But at the time, this was really novel. The idea of

laying out all these images in a grid in front of you. But there were a couple things. One, it was liquid and adaptable. So depending on the size of the images, the grid would re-adapt and make the images all look good instead of resize to fit in like this very specific size squares. The other thing that they did, I don't know if this was intentional or not, but the grid was oriented around vertical photos. Not.

horizontal. Interesting to allow more of them to be across the screen at once. Yeah, I imagine that's why they did it. And at the time, the first version of this of Pinterest was only on the web, not on mobile. And it even despite tote being, you know, coming out of Colprew apps to build labs to build mobile apps, they said, this product needs to live on the web. Wouldn't even come to mobile until 2011. But then when it did this vertical image prioritization was perfect for mobile. I remember back in this time when Pinterest shocked the world with what is canonically the Pinterest layout there were so many little clones like everybody tried to add a Pinterest style view to their product or you'd see on hacker news oh Pinterest for X and Pinterest meant that fluid layout that was a sort of the board that was laid out in the

you know, adaptable, fluid, way to lay out images. There's sort of an interesting meta topic here that products get shaped using the technology available and what is easy using that technology. And so it makes sense that on the web for the longest time, what we saw were tables and what we saw were, you know, sort of articles that had inline images and it's not an obvious and easy thing to do in early HTML and CSS to lay something out in this way, and particularly to do infinite scroll and a lot of the things that we come to expect knowing that these layouts exist now. And it's fascinating to think whenever you're designing a protocol or a platform or a core technology that you're really shaping the first five years or whatever, the first several set of use cases of what people actually do with it.

Evan, he's an architecture grad student in New York who designs this and would go on to be one of the most influential, you know, internet and mobile UI paradigms, you know, the last 10 years. Super cool. So they have this. They're pretty excited about this new version of the product. It's now November 2009 Thanksgiving and over Thanksgiving, Ben and Divya are at Thanksgiving. They're watching TV.

Ben had been, you know, trying to think about, what are we gonna call this new product? Cause tote doesn't make sense anymore. And of course talking with Davie about it. They're watching TV, right? Assume at least most US listeners are gonna remember the commercials that were all the rage at the time, the Dosekis commercials with the most interesting man in the world. And those are commercials were so great. How is this related, David?

Where are we going? It's really, it's related because they're watching TV, a most interested, a dosack he's commercial with the most interesting man in the world comes on. And Divi is like, that's it. That's the name for the company. Pinterest. Cause they were talking about pinboards and the interesting man in the world. And that's when inspiration strikes. And that's where Pinterest is born. Wow. Yeah. So I don't know what the moral of the story is there. Like spend more time watching.

TV with your loved ones. That's it. I mean, it's been more time with your loved ones feels like a great lesson to take away from any of this. Yeah. All right, listeners. Now is a great time to tell you about a longtime friend of the show, Vanta. AI has scrambled the whole security picture. It used to be that you proved that you were secure once a year on audit or a static PDF, then everyone would nod and you're done. But in an AI first world, that doesn't hold up anymore. Yep. Your risk surface changes every week now.

A vendor turns on an AI feature or someone writes in a new model without telling IT, and your posture is different than it was last week, let alone at your last audit. Vanta's own research found that around 70% of companies have this, quote unquote, shadow AI, running with no security review at all. Right. And that's where Vanta comes in. They're the leading agentic trust platform, meaning they've built the thing that closes the gap. And the way that they close that gap is Vanta agent.

Think of it as a GRC engineer, that's governance risk and compliance, except that it's software and it doesn't sleep. It finds the issues drafts the fixes and cuts the time that you'd spend on vendor assessments in half. In half, which is exactly why more than 16,000 companies today run on Vanta. Companies like RAMP, cursor, and snowflake all stay audit ready and catch the risks that crop up between audits across every vendor.

Every AI tool, the whole environment. And that's the real value. Trust has to be continuous now, which is why Vanta automates your security, your compliance, and the work to earn and prove trust. We're huge fans of Vanta over here. And literally hundreds of acquired listeners have become Vanta customers at their companies over the years. So you can get $1,000 off Vanta at Vanta.com slash acquired. That's V-A-N-T-A dot com slash acquired for $1,000 off and just tell them that Ben and David sent you.

So great. They've got a name for the product. They got this super innovative grid UI. They're ready to ship January 2010. They launch the email all their friends in Palo Alto. Everybody that they know from Google and Divi's friends at Facebook and Evan, of course, is you're going to Facebook at this time and nobody uses it. Everybody's like, what is this for? What are we supposed to do with this? What's interesting to me too about this point in this story is it's not like They had done an exercise instead. Okay, who's our core target user? What is our ideal customer profile? You know, we all know today Pinterest is I believe it's like two thirds used by women and they didn't come up with it and say Okay, what product can we build for moms? You know, it was very much

Here's a thing that is very agnostic to who's using it and what they're using it for, and let's just see. I'm sure you'll get into this, but how did they find that the right use case and who the real target user was? Yeah, well, so out.

Before that happens though, they're trying to do everything they can to get their friends to use it to, you know, do growth hacking, you know, it's all the rates of the day. So what they do, what they think is gonna more be really cool, they go to the Apple store, Ben goes to the Apple store in Palo Alto. I don't know if he does this every day or just for a couple days. And he just pull it up on all the computers. Yeah, he goes to all the computers and he changes the home screen to Pinterest. And all the computers in Palo Alto has precisely zero.

In fact, they applied a tech crunch disrupt and they get rejected. Didn't they like pull some strings to like get in somehow? I guess first mark was a sponsor and they pull some strings and they get them like a booth at tech crunch disrupt, but they're not part of the battlefield. Things are bad. Everybody's pretty down, but there is a ray of hope. And then some of the people that they've been trying to get to use it, they were literally anyone they know were Ben's friends back in Des Moines that he grown up with and these people were like so far from Palo Alto techies, but they seemed to like it and the other thing they had going for them back in Des Moines was Ben's parents and Ben's mom, you know, they're still ophthalmologists in Des Moines. They have all these patients and Ben's mom just starts telling

All of her patients to use Pinterest. This is like the equivalent of like when the the Snapchat story where it was Evan Spiegel's mom was a teacher at school. No, no, no, his cousin, I think. It is right. His cousin was a high school student student and they were using it to message. Yeah, because I message another apps were banned messaging apps were banned. Yeah, so great. But they all had their iPads. This is like the Pinterest equivalent. So they start seeing this. And they're like, oh, okay, interesting.

I'm not sure if this was related or not, but on a whim, Ben goes to a conference in Salt Lake City that January called the Alt Summit, which is a big women-focused design and blogging conference. I think a friend had suggested that he should go there, but I don't think he had really that much intention of, oh, this could be the promised land of our user base.

He goes there, he's talking to everybody about Pinterest, gets a bunch of people signed up, they start using it. And then on the flight back from Salt Lake City to San Francisco, well at the conference he meets a woman named Victoria Smith who's a blogger who lives in San Francisco. She has a blog called SF Girl by the Bay. She's actually moved to LA now, which is, of course, breaks the hearts of, you know, San Francisco people. But at the time she lived in San Francisco. And so they kind of hit it off and they're on the flight back and they decided like, hey, Let's do a collaboration together. So Pinterest is going to work with Asaf Girl by the Bay. And we're going to do this thing called Pinnit Forward, where Victoria will create a pinboard with all the things that mean, quote unquote, mean home to her, things that inspire her of home. And then they're going to tag another blogger and ask the next blogger to do

Create a board doing the same thing for them, and then just kind of pass it around through all the bloggers that are in this network and have been at the alt summit. And they do it. It sounds like a growth hack. It sounds like a growth hack. The bloggers get really into it and they of course all have their small but rabid fan bases of their blogs. Their audiences love it. They start using Pinterest, lo and behold, things start to turn around and the company starts to work. So this is a total aside. This is like, this is 2010.

A couple of years later, 2012, Pinterest is now a hot startup in the Valley. I'm starting business school at GSB at Stanford. And in my electronic business class, we had this great professor, I'm Mendelsohn, he's like a... It's an amazing name for our class. I know, electronic business. He's an old school guy, this is a holdover, but he's super smart. And he made us, in the first week in class, do the same thing on Pinterest. And I never understood why he had us do this random assignment on Pinterest.

And now I know. This is what the pinnet forward exercise. Yeah, the pinnet forward exit, but he didn't tell us it was the pinnet forward exercise. It was just like, I'll you guys like go create a pin go create a Pinterest board of your hometowns and what like home means to you. And only now years later, do I see where you get the idea for it? It's interesting thinking too about why it made so much sense for bloggers because for them, whether it was part of their own process as a tool, So you could imagine it's kind of difficult to go and collect good links with good images and put them somewhere if you're trying to go look at a hundred different websites and then write a blog post about sort of a synthesis of all this stuff. So it's both an interesting tool there, but then also it's probably the best way to showcase at that time a set of things that you want your your fans or followers to go and look at much better than you know making a separate WordPress blog post for each thing that you want to show off.

Totally there's there's a great talk Ben goes back to the alt summit in 2012 And that's where he has the the slide that has the there might be something going on in California in that talk But one of the questions from the audience is this woman who says Pinterest is something like the best thing that has happened to my business and my following and the worst thing that has happened to my actual blog because I now do everything on Pinterest. It's so much a better vehicle for if you're a design blog and you're sharing ideas and products that you find with people to use a service like Pinterest than it is to use a blog. The site starts growing between 40 to 50% month over month at that point. It's still really small.

But it really starts taking off and it sustains that growth rate for years. I mean, that's a magic number for startups. If you're growing 10% week over week or sort of that 40, 50% range month over month, I mean, that is you are a high growth startup. And that is how you know you're on to something. Yeah. All these angel investors that two years ago would barely even take a meeting with Ben. They start to notice that something's going on here. So in May of that year, Shauna Fisher, who was the head of M&A at IAC, she had started using Pinterest, probably heard about it from a blog and she loved it. She emails them and she's like, Hey guys, I want to invest. Their minds are blown. Catch me up. What, what year is this is after they were out of private beta?

They're still in private beta and they would be in private beta for the next two years So you had to you had invites and you could invite your friends So the site is still growing like crazy, but and a lot of the invites were distributed via these blogs. Ah interesting So Shana invests, and then she introduces Kevin Hartz, who's the CEO of Eventbreak, co-founder and CEO of Eventbreak with his wife, Julia, at that point, and also a prolific angel investor in Airbnb and others. He invests, friend of the show of Scott Belzky, invests, and there's like serious momentum behind this company. This is a fun aside, but also part of the story. July, a couple months later, they do the first...

real-life Pinterest meetup with Victoria with the SF girl by bay vlog at a store in Noi Valley called Rare Device which is now moving to Hayes Valley but is like right down the street from from where Jenny and I live now and it's too funny that's the first physical Pinterest meetup and then goes And all these people come out, it's not like a huge amount of people, but they're all so engaged and they love the product so much. And they're talking about how all the things that each other is pinning on about their homes and about everything else on Pinterest is inspiring them to go do these projects. And they're supporting each other and working with each other on these projects. And Ben is like, this is it. We have figured out what Pinterest is, who it's for.

And we're going to double down on this. And at this point, Ben is doing things like giving out his personal phone number, giving out his address, saying like, hey, please reach out to me anytime you have any feedback, or you really started doubling down on building this sort of wildly intimate relationship with the Pinterest users around this time. Yeah. And meetups start happening.

all over the country. And so at this time, this is, this is great. Remember Divya was the first HR person, Ben's way now, I don't think they're married yet, but girlfriend soon to be wife Divya was the first HR person at Facebook. Ben is so inspired about how fast they have to move here. He copies, he gets a poster of Facebook's move fast and break things motto. And he makes that the Pinterest motto. And then redesigns it. They redesigned it in Pinterest font and, you know, red lettering.

all over the office. So the opposite of Pinterest's actual mantra as a company, years and years after that. Yep, but in these very early days, this is when he realizes, okay, we gotta move fast. So they've just raised this angel round, they keep growing, and then the next.

Spring, they end up raising a $10 million, which was Series A from Led by Bessamer, which was a very large Series A for the time. Which closed in May. I want listeners pay attention to the timeline here. This round closed in May, just to continue tracking the share price here. That's at 17 cents a share. Yeah, 17 cents a share. Well.

And what was interesting about so Sarah Tevelle who's now who's a great investor now at GP at benchmark she was an associate at best at the time and she had heard about about Pinterest and she had found them and she had lobbied the firm to do it and Jeremy Levine the partner who ended up leading the deal. He was coming out to San Francisco one day for to meet with the he writes a blog post to me with Mintid, another company, and she convinced him, like, hey, we gotta go down to Palo Alto, we gotta meet with these Pinterest guys. Jeremy had like 10 minutes before his flight. He was like, okay, fine, I'll go down. And then ends up canceling his flight, stay and they do the deal, but it was totally Sarah. He was like supposed to end and lobby it. It was supposed to be a longer meeting, and then there was traffic because it was raining or something, and by the time he got down there, there was only 10 minutes for the meeting. And then of course, it's interesting enough that you just skip your flight.

Yeah, but yeah like I think we should put a stake in the ground right here and say just let's notice a trend of amazing women doing things like naming the company like pounding the table to make the investment I think Sarah should get a huge amount of credit for this spotting it super early Exactly, you know, it's it's debut comes up with the name It's Victoria Smith and the alt summit that which is all women focused bloggers and designers that come you know lands the product market fit for the company. It was Shauna at IAC who was the first, you know, elite angel investor to recognize the potential of the company and want to invest. And then it was Sarah who found them and led and pounded the table to do the series A. At the same time, this is super fun. So S.V. Angel on Conway's firm, they had passed on the company during the angel round.

Ben and I, a great friend of ours, Leslie Kincaid was working at S.V. Angel at the time, here in Silicon Valley, and Kevin Carter, who was also there at S.V. Angel, he was like, man, I think we might have missed...

this during the angel round that had happened with Wiskad and Kevin and Shana the past summer. And maybe we should like see, we don't really do series A, but we might want to really try and take another look here. And so Leslie and Kevin lobbied within the firm that SB Angel that, okay, we made a mistake. We should try and push our way into this round too. Kevin specifically was like Leslie, what do you, Like, what do you think? This is a female focus site, or at least that seems to be the user base. So Leslie pulls together a focus group of three women, I think at the firm, and basically went back to him and said, yeah, I know we passed, but there's no way we can miss this. So S.V. Angel ends up coming in to this series as well. And then this is so great. Both Sarah and Leslie, Sarah leaves Bessemer, Leslie leaves S.V. Angel, go and join the company as early employees. And we have to give

Shout out to Leslie too. She's helped us with a bunch of these stories and research here and she's now, she now runs the office and is chief of staff to the CTO at Convoy of in Seattle, which is another great company that will be in acquired episodes. Yeah. Thank you, Leslie. Thank you for the stories that are to come in this episode and listeners, you can find links to some cool posts from Leslie's Instagram over the years from 10 employees onward at Pinterest. Yeah. It's super fun. Go look at these pictures that Leslie has.

documenting all this because this is the first time we've had like actual visual accompaniments to the stories that we tell here. Three different offices and yeah. Yeah, super fun. So we're now in July of 2011. They hit a million users. Remember, it's still not open to the public. You still have to have an invite to join. In August of 2011, they're listed as one of Time Magazine's 50 Best Websites.

which actually meant something back then. Now, probably less relevant. Remember, it was May when the series A got done. We're still in August. And Andreessen Horowitz, spearheaded by Connie Chan, who was on the deal team at the time there, had gotten wind of all this great stuff that was going on at Pinterest. And they come in.

Jeff Jordan and Connie come in and lead the series be just a few months later in the company. There is $27 million at a $200 million valuation. Yeah, for those keeping track at home share prices now up to 72 cents. And in that time from May to August, the valuation goes from 40 million to 200 million. This is what happens when you hit that exponential growth curve. So they now have tons of resources a couple months later, though, in April 2012.

A transition happens and this really was, at this point, a long time coming and probably had de facto already happened if not officially. Ben Silverman finally becomes the actual CEO of Pinterest in April 2012. Paul leaves the company very amicably, ends up doing a few things. And he is now actually the chairman of an electric, yeah, an EV telecom company, a vertical takeoff and flying cars company, yeah, called Joby Aviation. Oh, that's awesome.

Yeah, super fun. It's an LP show prediction for the yeah, what was that from our 2019 predictions? Yeah, you Vitaal becomes the thing. That's bring though the growth just continues on a tear. So the 2012 presidential campaign is in high gear at this point in time. And Obama's running for his second term and Mitt Romney's running against him.

And both actually first in Romney, Mitt Romney's wife and then Michelle Obama joined Pinterest and on the campaign trail start, you know, building pinboards. I forgot about that. Oh, I forgot about that. Their life and inspiration and it is huge for, huge for the company.

In May, so we're now one year from when the series A had happened. The best summer and SP Angel series A were now in May of 2012. Rakuten, the Japanese e-commerce company, comes in, leads $100 million investment in Pinterest at a $1.5 billion valuation. Man, think about when you're raising money for a company and you're selling 20 to 30% of it.

The leverage that they had to have at that point to say sure will accept a hundred million dollars, but it's gonna be on for one 15th of the company. Yeah wild You know when Leslie had joined she adjoined in November of 2011 so just a few months before she was the 10th employee So they were only like dead people at the company is this a good time to talk about the Really forward-looking investment in general administrative, uh, pretty infrastructure. Okay, so listeners one thing that if you remember one thing from this episode to take away, it's Pinterest thought so far ahead on a lot of things that most companies say, ah, we'll think about that later. Think finance, think HR, think people, ops, think workplace, uh, think culture.

It was amazing starting really at the very early on from the company that Ben wanted to build and also in bringing Leslie and employee 10 really starting to invest ahead of their growth rather than a ship that's burning down and you're trying to patch it while it's on fire. I feel like this is really where the story of Pinterest and the history of Pinterest.

diverges from a lot of your typical kind of Silicon Valley hyper growth company. They just, they'd done the A, then they'd had this crazy growth. They'd done the B a couple months later. And like your average Silicon Valley company at this point would have been like, great, let's pour all this money into growth and like go, go, go. And to Pinterest and Ben's credit, I think in the long term, but this really impacted the trajectory of the company. They said now is the time to pause and build the foundation to support this hyper growth that we know we're going to go through. So yeah, they brought in Leslie as site operations manager. They got really serious about hiring executives and they start bringing over, again, remember, Divya was the first HR person at Facebook, they start bringing over some great, great, great people from Facebook to come in and build out all the infrastructure around the company. So a guy named Tim Kendall.

comes over and Tim had been an early Amazon guy and then had joined Facebook also very early was head of all monetization within Facebook. He joins Pinterest in March 2012 at first running product. He then eventually runs product engineering and all of builds the whole ads business for the company. He becomes president of the company. They bring over Barry Schmidt who was running marketing and communications at Facebook. He comes and joins Pinterest. Don Fall who was running operations at Facebook comes and does the same at Pinterest, and really a whole suite of, and I remember I have lots of friends who also were at Facebook and moved over to Pinterest at this point in time, and they start really building out a lot of the senior management and functions to scale up the company.

And all these people end up staying a really long time. So Tim is now CEO of a company called Moment, but he stayed about six years and built out all of these things at Pinterest. The other thing that they start really investing in and playing to their strengths is women engineers and women on the engineering team. And this becomes a huge ass. I mean, this is well ahead of You know, all of the things we'll cover in the Uber episode philosophy was our team across all functions should reflect our user base or, you know, trend much closer to that than most of the industry. So they have an early Pinterest engineer named Tracy Chow really becomes an absolute leader in recruiting for the company and diversity in engineering and in Silicon Valley more broadly. Pinterest has

way higher percentage of female engineers than your average Silicon Valley company. And it's huge asset to them. It's interesting. I was looking at it right before this. It was, it halvers around 25, 26% of their, their engineering team right now. A fun story too around all this time. And right as Leslie was, was joining the company. So they had been in Palo Alto and their first office there. You can go look at all our photos and their great early photos. They end up moving to San Francisco. And this was a huge moment at the time. I remember this like, because Palo Alto was still headquarters of Silicon Valley and where startups were and there were very few companies that were in the city and Pinterest moving up from Palo Alto to SF was the start of really the center of gravity shifting up to San Francisco. And it happened because Tim had just joined Tim Kendall and he had a friend who knew about they were looking for a big office space to support all this all this hiring they're going to do. This is the check-in factory. Yes. He had a friend who knew about an abandoned

chicken factory in Soma in San Francisco right next to the CalTrain station like perfect location and And so they jumped on it and the Pinterest now the core of what's now the Pinterest campus right around the CalTrain station there started in an abandoned chicken factory So through all this time though and all these fun stories There's no revenue. There's no business model. Like the product is seeing tons of usage and engagement and growth. But they're not making any money, not a dollar revenue. And they're even making noise about the fact that they're not. They're getting pressed for this, they're getting, you know, Ben Solarman's getting asked a conferences and his party line is we want to be really thoughtful about this. We want to have something like measured growth or thoughtful growth and we want to do monetization when we feel it is right for our users, which

they towed for years after you would think they would start experimenting with monetization. Which is true and also fits their personality, but also they have a very traumatic experience with this, right? After the series B, but before Tim Kendall joins to come in and ultimately build out the ad and monetization platform, they were seeing that one of the things that started happening on Pinterest from the early days, and especially coming from the blogging community is people posted pins And the pins were based on, they put affiliate links in them. So when you click through the pins, the link, it would be an affiliate link to whatever the retailer was that was selling the product. And then the bloggers or whoever posted the pin, they'd make a they'd make a cut on that transaction. And so Pinterest definitely saw that this was going on. They thought, well, this is pretty interesting. It was probably designed as an experiment from the get go, but they worked with a company called Schim links in early 2012. And they

without warning, they pulled all of the affiliate links, unwrapped them with skim links powered Pinterest affiliate links, and Pinterest took over all those affiliate links that were running through the site. It caused a huge uproar and to Ben and Pinterest credit, they pulled the plug on it.

Immediately and they apologize and actually later on in 2015 they would kick all affiliate links period off the platform and just ban them totally But it was so powerful and demonstrated the monetization potential and Pinterest place in the commerce flow that for years afterwards They were still getting checks from like that week or two that they had affiliate links on they were still getting affiliate checks and it was like a very powerful way to prove the potential here. But then they bring Tim on, and they don't do anything. Ben is eluded to for the next two years around monetization after this. 2014 is when they started. Yep, it was May 2014. They launched promoted pins. And by this point in time, they had built all the product and engineering and ad sales functions and organizations to do this, right.

They launch promoted pins. The first promoted pin is from Vineyard Vines. The East Coast Fashion Retailer. It goes well. They work just like we talked about with Emily White on the Instagram episode. They work with a few select partners to start. And then in December 2014, they open it up to everyone. And it starts working really well. So much so that in...

March of 2015, there's so much hype around the company. They were about to hit 100 million users. They've just launched this advertising platform-promoted pints that's going well. They raised at an $11 billion valuation going from. They had raised a few times at successfully higher valuations from the 1.5 earlier, but this is a massive jump-up.

This is a pretty firm commitment to we're going to be a public company. It's really hard when you raise money at higher than a 10 billion dollar valuation to say, you know, we're on an acquisition track of some sort. Not just a public company, but like, this is the next Facebook. You know, there are all these people that have come over. Great people from Facebook. There's all this potential. The ad platform is working super well. Usica is going great. You know, think about this.

$11 billion valuation March of 2015 and we'll get into the IPO just now. So that's been four years. Yeah. It's four years since an $11 billion valuation. So things do continue to go well. However, user growth at this point right after this basically flat lines and they had just hit a hundred million users. But as we've been alluding to, they have started having a huge problem. They've saturated most of their core target market in the US they do eventually start going internationally back in starting in 2016 2017 and that reignites growth but they just can't get men to use the product and is still a big issue to this day yeah flash forward to some some numbers from the S1 listeners so today in the US they're up to what 250 million users but

globally. But in the US here, it's 82 million. If you go and you look three years ago in Q1 of 2016, that was 65 million users in the US. So when you look at their very nice user growth, albeit not monetization growth internationally, and compared to the United States, international looks like, oh, great, a high growth company. US looks like, okay, it's been pretty flat for a while. When they did that big fundraise, the vision like we were saying was, this is going to be the next Facebook. And I think what Happens over the next couple of years is they realize the market realizes this is going to be a great company but has a very specific target market that is not every person in the world a very specific target market and a very specific time and place for use rather than all day every day like Facebook so that said though the monetization

engine starts really working by 2016 two years after they launched it they did 300 million in revenue in 2016 2017 that grows over 50% they do 472 million in revenue 2018 that grows hugely again they do 755 million in revenue which is a serious amount especially given the and speaks to the power of Like they saw with the affiliate link test, the power of where they sit in the commerce flow, that even though they have a relatively smaller user base compared to other big social networks, there's incredible monetization potential here. Yep. If you think in like a Porter's five forces since they they have a tremendous amount of power in this value chain from when the user sees something they're interested in into where Pinterest can sort of steer their attention and how they can derive monetization from doing that.

they go into great detail in the S1, but this isn't just point of purchase, it's awareness, it's reminding people about the product, it's steering them to a purchase, and then it's actually executing the purchase. So it is sort of all across the lifecycle of you buying something. On the back of all this, just last month in March of 2019, two very big things happened from the company, two very big announcements. First, Leslie Kilgore.

joins the board. Do you remember Leslie Killigore? I do. And I was trying to remember from where? So I went and looked her up on LinkedIn. I thought it was something where I like, it may have known her personally or something like that. And then I looked up on LinkedIn and I was like, Oh, previous acquired episode. Yes. It's almost like we know her personally. The acquired superhero with the writing shotgun alongside Barry McCarthy from our Netflix two party, Leslie Killigore, who was in the CMO and Netflix. And Now on the board. Yeah, yeah, I think that's right. So she just joined the board of Pinterest, which is awesome. Love it, would love it when the heroes and not Carl, like, come back into these stories. And then, of course, second on March 22nd, Pinterest files, publicly files, it's S1 to go public. And then

Over the next week and a half, as we covered on the LIFT IPO episode, the LIFT IPO happens. We'll talk about that in a minute during narratives. But when Pinterest sets the range for its IPO on April 8th, this is after the dip in trading from LIFT. They set it at $15-$17 per share.

which equates to about a range of eight and a half to $11 billion valuation below the last private round, which they had done another private round in 2017 that valued the company at $12.3 billion. So this is pricing below. It is. And listeners, like, they've done a series D series, E F G, a G one or something like that.

and then they stop counting the letters, but there's six rounds that are in this sort of 200 million, 300 million dollar range of amount of money that they're raising. They had that rapid acceleration in valuation and then continued to raise hundreds of millions of dollars over and over again somewhere around that price point for a while. As the user growth, especially domestically, was flat lining. So then on this past Wednesday, April 17th, the price, the IPO, at $19 to share above the range and then equates to a $12.6 billion market cap very slightly above the last private valuation. And then on Thursday, they start trading and they pop up 28% close at $24.40 a share or a $16 billion market cap. So...

a nice, you know, nicely above the last private round, but still not a 10x here. The share price is now above where every shareholder bought. So, you know, we've only had one day of trading, and I think we can discuss this, but we saw sort of what happened with, with Lyft in the couple of weeks after they started trading. But from what we know so far, it looks like the strategy of pricing modestly and being below the last round and then letting the pop sort of happen in the market has worked.

Yeah, as opposed to lift, which we saw increased its range during the red show several times, then priced above the red show, then popped big time on the first day and then of course has been down since then. So if there's one thing we should probably learn for ourselves on acquired is it's very likely we'll see a pop on the first day no matter what and then it's you know in the weeks and months that follow that we should really be paying attention.

Yeah, yeah. So, you know, I think we and everybody were very excited and still are very excited about Lift and their IPO, but there was a lot of euphoria that has been tampered over the last several weeks. All right, listeners. Now is a great time to thank our longtime friend of the show, ServiceNow. If you are running a large enterprise, AI agents are likely spread across every team and deploying them is no longer the hard part.

Yeah, the hard part is knowing what permissions they have, what employees are using them for, or what decisions AI is making. AI security for an enterprise at scale is not a small concern. Like the risks are real. Exactly. And the challenge with AI is governing it, securing it, measuring it, and making sure that it actually delivers value. That is why ServiceNow built the AI Control Tower.

Yep, AI Control Tower gives enterprises a single place to see, manage, govern, and optimize AI across the entire business. And it works with any AI, not just theirs. Every device on your network, every permission across every system, every AI agent, visible, and secure in one place. And service now can do this.

because they've spent more than 20 years building the operational backbone of the enterprise. The workflows, governance, approval, security controls, and institutional knowledge that power how work actually gets done across IT, HR, customer service, finance, and security. Service now already runs more than 100 billion.

workflows annually, and trillions of transactions for more than 85% of the Fortune 500. So when companies need a place to govern AI at enterprise scale, they're building on a platform at the center of how their business already operates. And in a future that isn't going to be one AI, it's going to be thousands of AI agents working across every function of the company. But the question is, who's managing them all?

So if you're trying to turn AI ambition into real business outcomes and make it work safely, securely at scale, go check out servicenow.com slash acquired and tell them that Ben and David sent you. So let's go into narratives here. So listeners, what we decided to do in these IPO episodes is walk through what the bulls are saying and what the bears are saying. And that way as we get into kind of our discussion, we can kind of have a baseline representation of both sides. On the bull case, I think their growth rate relative to their comps of Twitter and Snap is really encouraging. They're growing much faster than Snap or Twitter to put some numbers behind that. Pinterest grew its user-based 23% last year. Twitter and Snap saw user numbers decline. And so when you think about this tier of ad-based

You know, internet, social, I think we can leave social out for Pinterest, but social-ish business models. Platforms. Platforms. Yes, that's- At-base platforms. Yes. Very interesting to compare there and very promising. The other thing is, and this is from a great financial summary on seeking alpha that we'll put in the show notes, if the growth rate for both revenue and expenses stays the same in 2019 as it did in 2018, Pinterest will be profitable.

they'll earn pre-tax $65 million because of the way that the business is monetizing well and user-based continues to grow, especially internationally, more monetization domestically and then growth internationally, there's really going to be a business here. And I think you've got to really whip out your discounted cash flow models to try and understand, is it worth 13 billion over some time frame, but contrasting this against other IPOs that we're seeing recently where there may not be profitability in sight, wouldn't shock me if it happened in the next year, 18 months.

Yeah, well Pinterest is a classic case of... the historic technology company business model of very high fixed costs that and basically zero variable costs they get leveraged off over a large user base and once that user base passes a point where the revenue from per user is covering the fixed costs everything above that is basically pure margin now that is definitely not the case with marketplaces and especially real world marketplaces as we saw with lift and we'll talk about soon with Uber, but doesn't mean they're bad businesses, but it's just a very different business structure. Right. Do you be anything else in in bowls before we go into bears? Um, you know, I think the, the, the bowl case we alluded to this earlier, but, um, you know, I think Pinterest actually does a really nice job in the S1 laying this out and, and, and Ben has, this element has always said this about it. That it is, you know, you were joking about

Not always a social network, is it not a social network? And the S1, they say Pinterest is the productivity tool for planning your dreams. Dreaming and productivity may seem like polar opposites. But on Pinterest, inspiration enables action and dreams become reality. Visualizing the future helps bring it to life in this way. Pinterest is unique. Most consumer internet companies are either tools or media. Pinterest is not a pure media channel nor is it a utility. It's a media rich.

utility that satisfies both an emotional and functional need, et cetera. We call it discovery. And I think that is perhaps one of the strongest cases here is that for product discovery, there is nothing quite like Pinterest in the funnel. You know, for Google, Google serves demand fulfillment better than anything known to man.

You know, Facebook also serves discovery to a certain extent, but I think it's not quite in the same way or as effective at it as Pinterest is. Pinterest is where you go to specifically look for something. At Facebook, you're being shown products as you're looking at other things. The Facebook newsfeed is like the best ad form out of all time, but it can be a little disruptive. Yeah, it's like ads in a newspaper, whereas to bring it full circle, Pinterest is like browsing a catalog where you are intending to To get inspiration and then act on that inspiration. Yep, so the biggest bear case at least to me is that They will not be the only ones to own this market for long We've seen Instagram before try to get into

both commerce and a Pinterest style functionality of discovery. Both of them have not gone well. Their recent effort into commerce is much more serious and they've launched collections, which is going to look a lot like Pinterest boards. If Instagram can do to Pinterest what it did to Snapchat with stories, they'll be in big trouble. But I think to flip back to Bull real quick, it's a reasonable argument to make that Pinterest actually fulfills a much different emotional need when you open that app than Instagram does. And Instagram may not be able to offer the same solution to that job to be done of getting inspired and collecting things in its format that Pinterest has been able to do by really solidifying its brand. And this is what you go to Pinterest for. Yeah, I mean, totally too. Having gone and watched, you know, all these talks by Ben Silverman over the last few years to his total credit. You know, he's been, if you were to

listen to the narratives leading up to the IPO. He and Pinterest are talking about how Pinterest goal is not to get you to spend more time online. It's to inspire you to do projects offline and take action in the real world. That sounds like a sound bite he came up with to market Pinterest in reaction to everything that's happened with Facebook and Instagram and the rest of the internet over the last 24 months. That's not true. He's been saying that since 2012. Pinterest has always been about that.

Yes, the potential mitigation to that to Instagram is like Instagram's cultural DNA and Facebook's business model is about the attention suck and that is not the culture, neither the cultural DNA nor the business model of Pinterest.

The biggest reason to be a bear here isn't that it's not going to be a good business, or they're not going to be able to maintain the size of the business. Unless, of course, you think that Instagram is going to come and eat all their lunch. Frankly, it's just the smallest of these online ad platform companies. When disruptive markets are created, the biggest opportunities tend to get filled first, and then the smaller ones tend to get filled over time. When we saw Let's take marketplace businesses, for example, in the sharing economy. If you look at what people spend in GDP, they spend on their house, they spend on transportation, then they spend on food, and you look at sort of Airbnb, and then you look at Uber and Lyft, and then you look at... You get door to action, door to action. Instacard, and you know, when you see a new paradigm, like online advertising...

you know, you see the biggest ones that are taken are intent based search and then there's you know, what we didn't realize was gonna be such a big market but social media advertising and then there's this new thing that is you know, I guess discovery based or inspiration based or curation based advertising which is just smaller like it's just not a bigger thing I was gonna wait to make this point in grading but since we're already here I want to make the point that when I first started researching. I was thinking there's basically two distinct online advertising markets. They're social based and they're search based. But Pinterest is really somewhere between there with the curation and discovery based. And I think now I'm thinking about it more as a spectrum. And I think

If you think about it as sort of a smiling curve where there's way more value creation if you go pure search or pure social, there's there's less in the middle because frankly, you're not spending as much time there and you're not doing mission critical things there as much as you are during during search. But you know, it's still a super sticky product, a super useful product, a product that monetize as well. It's just not one of the other two. Yeah. Well, I think this is building off kind of the the end of history and facts here where we alluded to this. I'm not sure that it's not that the value is, I think there's a ton of value in Pinterest and what they offer to advertisers in this...

discovery engine works incredibly well and is very unique. The problem, though, is just the product itself, the consumer product, is a niche product, a very large niche, but we alluded to it in history and facts. There are 86 million-ish MAUs in the US and a very, very, very high percentage of them are women.

despite years of trying on Pinterest part, just don't use the product in nearly as high a percentage. They've tried to fix it. I just don't know that it's fixable with what the product is. So, thus, it's just a smaller market. Everyone is aware that they need to search for stuff, and a third of those or a quarter of those people are aware that they need to be inspired and curate stuff based on what inspires them. Yep. Hard to know if it is...

specifically men or women are that's just the way the psychological profile of users of Pinterest tend to fall out. But there is a huge segment or segments of the population at least domestically that despite years of knowing about Pinterest trying to use it just really isn't going to become engaged and use it in the same way as the other segments. So, you know, I mean, I think when you really think about it, maybe this is the way to think about it with Pinterest, the market for the core Pinterest product is the same market as lifestyle magazines and if you think about what is the life the market for lifestyle magazines there it tends to skew heavily towards women design magazines home magazines fashion magazines there certainly are men that that read lifestyle magazines but just at a much smaller degree and that is the market that is where there is core fit with the Pinterest product and I think it's had and probably will continue to have a very hard time expanding outside of that

All right, so that's our bear case. Let's talk how did the IPO go? So despite my pure burning hatred for this term, under corn. That's a terrible, terrible, terrible term. They effectively had a down-round IPO. And let's talk about sort of flat-round. Flat-round. Flat-round IPO. Well, yes. This was technically flat. The share price was lower, but because there were new shares issued the end market capital.

So this has happened before and we covered it well on the square episode where it was so significant of a down-round of the IPO that it actually took what a year or more to climb back up to their last private valuation price. And so you saw people who had stock options at a strike price before the IPO where then they actually had to wait years and years for that to recover from being underwater. So they actually had a compensation issue across the board at the company. That's not at all of the case with Pinterest. Basically, you know, everyone is in the clear now. Now, of course, if you look and

see that people bought shares at an $11 billion valuation four years ago, and it's set 13 now. That's not a phenomenal return like it is for any of these early investors, but I'm not sure that they could have done anything better. And I think it was probably smart of them to not try to make this an up-round for vanity purposes. They obviously saw what happened with the aftermath of the lift IPO.

They swung the pendulum hard the other way in being conservative here. It's interesting to know that we have another data point here of the public markets, valuing companies within range of where the private markets have been. I think there was a lot of fear coming into this wave of IPOs that those two things were going to be dramatically, dramatically different. It doesn't feel like they are. No, it feels like they've been...

At the very least priced appropriately in the private markets, maybe appropriately a couple of years ahead of the curve, but not completely mispriced. So I do think that's actually a great segue into what would have happened otherwise in talking about, so why did they go public?

Could they have not gone public? Could they have done a direct listing? One thing that I found really interesting was that they actually have $600 million of cash in the bank and they've raised about a billion and a half over over time. They're net operating loss right now after tax in 2017 was $126 million and last year was $63 million. So you know, they're trending toward profitability. They actually probably didn't need to raise any money in this IPO.

Yeah, this is really puzzling to me and we were talking about this before the show. So by those numbers, even if they maintain the same burn rate, which they won't because they're trending to profitability, assuming revenue keeps growing, they have years of runway still in the bank. Why did they just raise all this money and delete themselves? This seems like a clear-cut case for me for doing a DPO. Yeah, David, it does feel like they...

Totally could have done a direct offering here and they've got cash in the bank. They're gonna get profitable. I do wonder Are they have Leslie Kilgore on their board? You know access to Barry McCarthy here And that went well enough that we're hearing rumors Slack is going to do a direct listing here in the near future. And so there could be two things going on. One is they feel that their ability to raise cash right now is on really favorable terms. So it's great to get that cash into the company for an unknown purpose. The other is maybe they're gearing up for some serious spend. And they're going to branch out into something that requires a lot of new cash, the same way that StitchFix used a lot of the cash from their IPO to actually start.

retail brands that are our first party brands. You know, I'm not sure that this international expansion is interesting because it's growing really fast from a user perspective because they actually started caring about that in 2016, whereas they were very domestically focused until then, but they're really not monetizing any significance internationally, so it could be to spend aggressively on bringing advertisers into their international funnel, but it's honestly a little puzzling. I agree as well.

This all would have had to be in the works long before the lift IPO, but you know, the only reason I can think of is just to be conservative as well and make sure things go well because DPO's are still relatively unproven. But again, if you don't need the cash, like it, which to be clear, lift and Uber need the cash and we'll talk about that on the Uber episode. But if you don't need the cash and companies have raised so much in the private markets, DPO really seems like the way to go. There's no lockup period. You're not deluding yourself. You're not selling more of the company. It has a lot of advantages. You can tell I'm of the Barry McCarthy school of thought here. Yeah. Well, you know, we've seen one DPO and here we are now asking like we're looking at every deal going why not DPO? Why not DPO? I mean, look, they did the standard thing and they did it pretty well. And I think it's not like just because

Spotify did it. That's a thing that everyone feels like is a one of two options they can pursue now. Yeah, yet yet. We'll see on Slack. Okay. So we move to our newly retitled next section. Yes. So David, tell us about this retitling. Yeah. So, okay, this is ordinarily where we would do tech themes, but Ben and I were texting the other day and we love tech themes. It's one of our favorite parts of the show, but we realized that like It's actually something more than that, and tech themes kind of sells it short. So we're going to rename this section to playbook. And what's actually really interesting here is not just what themes in tech, this particular company's story reflects, but what are like the...

actionable things that we can learn from this story that we can all put in our playbooks as operators as investors and we think this will be really cool in a good way in the spirit of Pinterest to catalog all the things we're learning from this show over time. So we're gonna this is gonna be our first experiment with playbook. Yep.

All right, so we focused on this one, but I just want to highlight it. What makes Pinterest different is a significant focus on building out infrastructure in the company ahead of growth in wild contrast to other unicorn cousins. Yep. I worry a little bit that people will take the wrong lesson from...

the surface level facts here, and this is one of the reasons we do this show. You look at the way Pinterest has carried itself over the last 10 years, and then you look at the way, say, Uber or Lyft have carried themselves, or Airbnb too, and like, there is definite craziness going on within those other companies, and their markets are so much bigger, and they will probably end up being bigger companies in the long run. Pinterest, the market is smaller. It's extremely well managed, and will be a smaller company in the long run, but I feel like much better managed. The lesson is not don't manage your company well. The lesson is target big markets one and two, manage your company well such that you have the highest probability of succeeding within them. Yep. It's a great elaboration there. Another point that I wanted to, I think this is really more a point of discussion and

David, we talked on the LP show about the downsides of being a tools business rather than a platform or a network or a marketplace. Pinterest is kind of a tools business in that it's much more about me and maybe a handful of other people I'm sharing a board with and it's much less about communicating with other people, seeing what other people are up to. So it has I think less significant network effects. How do you juxtapose it sort of being a tools business, but competing for the very same advertisers that these like strong, strong network effect businesses are coming for? Yes. Great. Okay. This is one of my entries in the playbook here. You could debate on the network effects aspect and certainly social network effects in the way that Facebook, Instagram, et cetera, have them.

Pinterest does not, but I think they do have a very strong flywheel. We should do a whole LP episode where we've talked about this where we just nerd out on like what we think the differences are between network effects and flywheels and whatnot. But the flywheel is users add content and pins to the site. The more pins there are in the site, the more things there are the users new users and existing users get inspired by and then repin and so there's a super strong flywheel where as people come on and they add content that content drives more engagement for more users who add more content which drives more users within the segment of people who find this whole thing attractive.

Even if it's not a super strong network effect, you can still have a super strong flight. Yeah, like I don't care. I mean, well, maybe we should have an acquired pinboard. So in that case, I would care that you banner on the service. But if we don't have a reason to collaborate, I don't care that like you or like any of my other friends are specifically on the service. But I care that a lot of other people are because then they're adding content. They care about the content. Right.

Right, and like I don't mean to say there's not network effects. I mean, you could imagine a way worse version of Pinterest, which is you can't discover anything that anybody else uploaded. Like there's not a business there. Yeah. Yeah. So it's a tool, but the back end of that personal tool is powered by the incredible amount of data and work that everyone else on the platform has done. What I think a lesson there is like an interesting one of to maybe modify the.

From our LP show with you know the lesson wasn't quite don't build tools, but it was like tools are Limited but if you can figure out how to make a tool that gets better for users as more people are on the service sort of like Jake was talking about on with his coaching networks thesis at emergence That can create a powerful flywheel. Yep. Do you have more? Nope. That's it. Cool. I had a couple real quick One I was just struck in the history and facts like when we talked about it 2008 and the recession and the Lehman Brothers collapse, like these massive events that happen in the economy and socially can have like such opportunity, you know, even in like recession. So like Airbnb and again, what we've talked about this before and we'll cover it in depth on when we do an episode on them someday, like what enabled Airbnb was the recession and specifically the housing crisis and same

in a much less direct way, you know, led to the history that led to Pinterest and led to the history that led to Lyft. Whenever these big events happen, it's always a good idea to just pick your head up and say, hmm, okay, what is this going to, what retilling of the soil is this going to enable now? Both as an investor and thinking about starting companies. The other thing I wanted to, that I think this story illustrates is just the power sometimes of just not stopping, you know, like Ben's story and and uh, tote and Colby Labs and Pinterest and like doing the business plan competition. You know, it would have been so easy to just give it up. You know, uh, and not stopping doesn't mean banging your head against a wall with something that isn't working. It means not giving up on the idea of like building something period, like pivot what you're doing into something that's going to work and listen to users and find product market fit. But just calling game over.

means literally game over. Yeah. It reminds me of a great quote. So Bolu, the CEO of Future Advisor, spoke at one of the first startup weekends that I organized like a decade ago or something. And I remember him saying, the way to succeed is to just never admit failure. Like, as long as you don't shut down, you haven't lost. And that's not fully true. Like, that's a good way that you can have a small business that doesn't grow at all and just keep going. But I think what you're saying is if what you're looking to do is build something big and impactful as long as you don't give up and build in the direction of what could catch, it's unlikely that you will do that for your entire life and have something that never works. So just keep trying. I think there's two versions of giving up or failing.

One version of it is what we are doing is not working. We have failed at that. We are going to give up doing that. That's great. When that's clearly the case, you should do that and do that as soon as possible. But don't do the other version of giving up, which is saying, and thus we are going to call game over and shut down the company and go get jobs somewhere. As long as you still have the desire and the resources to keep going.

Keep going. And there's tremendous value in keeping a team together. You know, this is something I think that we realize at Pioneer Square Labs, the 25 of us that all sort of like systematically build companies over and over and over again, is after you fail on a few things together, or maybe even succeed on a few things together, you know in your small group who's good at what? You have norms and communication patterns and operations around how you work together and you get way more efficient at building together. So if something didn't work, like keeping the team together and keeping your processes intact and keeping your knowledge of what each other's competencies are, is hugely valuable. And so I think for anyone considering a pivot, I mean, it's almost like, yeah, you bring some baggage when you pivot, but you bring far more value from being a team that knows how to work together.

Yeah, it's almost like the playbook is if you think you need to pivot, you probably should have pivoted a month ago. But if you're thinking about shutting down your company and you still have a team you like and money in the bank or whatever resources you need to keep going, you should definitely not shut down your company. Yep. All right, grading. So the way that we grade these IPOs is rather than issuing a grade, we discuss what a few years from now and a plus would look like versus, you know, say, a C or D or F. David, I'll go first. I think an A plus looks like cracking international monetization. I think this company can continue to grow to become a 20, 30 billion dollar market cap company over time. If they can figure out how to continue growth internationally and how to monetize internationally like they do domestically. I don't think it's a crazy playbook to do that.

but I don't think there's a bigger success path than that. Yeah. It's funny. I was going to say like the A plus to me is they take this. Yeah. I think that's an A. That's like an A minus to A. The A plus is they take all this money they just raised in the IPO and they have some vision that they are keeping secret for now and Ben isn't telling anyone yet about how they're going to expand the market here and they use these resources whether through acquisition or investment internally to do that. That would be like, yes, that takes them to, you know, multi-hundred billion dollar market cap company. I think it's really hard. Like, I have no idea what that vision would be. So, um, so I think that's hard. But yeah. So otherwise, I think the sooner you described is like super solid A minus to A. You know, there's a possibility that they won't be able to monetize internationally like they, they can with the US.

or even that people start churning off of them because Instagram manages to launch something that sort of leverages their really close relationship with users to get them to start using a Pinterest-like experience. And you know, Facebook is a total shark at figuring out whether they have something there or not and rolling it out broadly. So my F there would be if one, they can't monetize internationally or two, they get their legs cut out by Facebook.

You know, one thing that we didn't, usually we find these things when we do our research, but for whatever reason we didn't this time, is do you think Facebook ever tried to buy Pinterest or anybody else tried to buy Pinterest? So Facebook did not, not that I found and tried to buy Pinterest. There actually was a story very early on in New York where yeah.

Ben tried to encourage a magazine publisher to buy them. This is back when they were towed, I think. Yeah, it's like 20 times or something. Yeah, so that doesn't count. But yeah, I don't know if that's because nobody ever did try to buy Pinterest or their valuation grew so quickly. Just like the company's so quiet and introverted that the stories never got told. But this is a rarity in that there aren't stories like this out there. It's kind of interesting to think about. Can anyone buy them? Maybe Facebook.

Yeah, I mean their valuation is you know, they're $16 billion market cap company of course somebody could buy them Facebook could buy them Amazon could buy them You know what I guess where would it make sense? Yeah, and also like culturally You know, I think Pinterest would be very attractive to Facebook right now for lots of reasons, but could it work culturally within the company? I think that be hard. Yeah, well I think Facebook needs to do something to change both public perception and retain employees. So it wouldn't strike me to see Facebook do something dramatic soon. And so the C minus D case, I think is is that they have fully saturated monetization in the US. They can't monetize internationally. And this is a break even seven hundred million to a billion dollar revenue business going forward.

Yeah, and frankly, they just raised a bunch of cash. The way that we grade these acquisitions is when you acquire this asset, are you able to do something interesting with it? You know, with this IPO, it's like they've just raised all this money. What are they going to do with it? So I think, you know, I'd like to see them take a shot on goal with that. See the IPOs. You gotta spend the money. All right, should we move on to carve outs? Yeah, let's do it.

Mine is, I've done this podcast before, but there was just an exceptional episode. Invest like the best. It's a great podcast. That's so good. Really good interview show. Recently, I had an episode with Eugene Wei, and Eugene wrote this great blog post, Invisible Assam Toads, which shouldn't even call it. It's an essay. It's a half novel. And Eugene is super brilliant, and there's five or six very interesting takeaways from this Invest like the best episode. My favorite of them is applying blockchain theory.

to social networks. So if you think about what makes a blockchain work, there is proof of work. And then there is a reward for doing that work. And the reward is sort of synonymously the proof of work. And it has as an intrinsic value thing. And that propagates out over a network. And I had never thought before to use that paradigm to apply it to a social network. And so when you do something like post on Instagram, you're doing a proof of work.

and you're putting up that picture that picture has value and you get likes and follows in exchange for doing that work and the people who are the most successful on that platform are the people who are able to work within the constraints of that social media to basically do the most interesting thing within those constraints and a successful social network happens when you are able to create a format that where that proof of work is extremely variable so the breadth of skill is you can do really crappy things with it and you can also do amazing wonderful things with it and also that the perception of the value of the proof of work is variable and so it's not everybody agrees that that is the best picture and

everybody can sort of have a different interpretation of what high quality is and a new social network can emerge when there is a tool set to do that proof of work, to make that profile, to do that image, whatever it is, that enables, and of course I am. Eugene says it much more eloquently, but I'm only even trying to follow along because of my respect for you and Eugene. Otherwise, you would have lost me a blockchain.

Sorry. Well, anyway, it suffices to say it's interesting fodder if you're thinking about how do new social paradigms emerge and what creates explosive growth social network and what doesn't. And I think the comparison to blockchain is a metaphor. It's an interesting framework. Yeah. Yeah. So great. So great. Patrick does an awesome job with the invest like the best.

podcast and I love it. If you're an acquired listener who doesn't listen to that yet, you definitely are going to love it too. So add it to your playlist. Okay. Mine is, well, first I want to underscore Ben, your carve out on the lift IPO episode. Bill Gurley's talk about running down a dream and finding and succeeding in a career you love. I did run not walk to go watch it and it is so good. I sent it to so many friends. So great.

I just have so much respect for Bill and every dimension, but so cool of him to do this talk. Go do it at his alma mater at UT. It's really inspiring, no matter where you are in your career.

I definitely want to underscore if you haven't watched that yet, go watch it. But my, my carve-up for the week is similar. Somebody who has found a career that he loves and is succeeding at it is Alex Rodriguez, A-Rod. A-Rod's interviews on ESPN and on YouTube are so good. Like, I just love watching them. Whatever you think about A-Rod, the baseball player, like A-Rod, the post-career, you know.

video and television journalist and interviewer is amazing. Like he's so smart, he's so dedicated to, was so dedicated to his craft of playing baseball and hitting. And now to being an interviewer and just like watching him nerd out with, with other people who are also dedicated to their craft is great. So every interview is great. One of my favorites is his interview with Astro Center Field or George Springer. So we'll link to that. He also has a great one with Giancarlo Stanton at the Yankees.

But you can't go wrong. Watch Sir J. Rad on YouTube. You'll enjoy yourself. Thanks, David. All right, listeners. Now is a great time to talk about one of our favorite companies, Statsig. Yes, there is a reason why the best product teams rely on Statsig, whether they are iterating on their core product features or shipping AI-powered experiences at scale. Yep. In the...

crazy speed of today's AI world. Shipping fast is just table stakes now. It's basically trivial to build and deploy your app constantly. The real advantage is how quickly you learn what changes actually created value for customers. And how fast you can use that signal to guide what you shipped next. This is where Statsig comes in. It brings experimentation, feature flags, and product analytics into one unified system so teams can ship safely, test rigorously, and directly link what they changed to how users actually behaved. So if you want to make learning your competitive advantage, whether you're building new AI experiences, or just evolving your existing core product,

go to statsig.com slash acquired to get started. You can go to glow.fm slash acquired. Seriously, I promise you'll be overjoyed with how buttery smooth it is to get more acquired right here in your favorite podcast player. And as of today, everyone starts with a free seven day trial. And with that, we will see you next time. Yeah.

Delete this episode?

This removes the episode page and its saved audio from this library.