← All shows

The Daily - Arizona_s Food Stamp Crisis Is Coming for the Rest of the U.S

Duration 30:15 · Language en · Published Aug 05, 2026 · 5 highlights

Summary

本期节目调查了美国 SNAP 食品援助制度改革在亚利桑那州造成的剧烈后果:该州领取人数减少一半,约45万人失去援助,其中包括超过10万名儿童。共和党主张该项目规模过大、可能抑制就业并存在欺诈,但节目指出,改革的直接财政动因也是为特朗普政府的减税政策筹资。新法不仅扩大了工作要求,还规定错误率过高的州必须承担最多15%的福利成本,从而使州政府更害怕错发救济,而不是错误地拒绝合资格者。亚利桑那州为规避约3亿美元的潜在罚款,大幅增加证明材料要求,同时削减约三分之一的经办人员,最终制造了电话无人接听、申请反复丢失和无法完成面谈的官僚僵局。年轻母亲 Alejandra 在工作和照顾孩子之余多次申请无果,甚至因缺乏营养停止母乳喂养,并坦言绝望到幻想偷取食物。65岁的祖母 Dee 仅因误交了错误年份的收入表便被关闭案件,申诉五个月无人回应,家庭每月骤失700美元食品预算。节目认为这些个案并非例外,而是制度激励倒置的结果,并警告随着联邦行政补助削减和新规在全国生效,其他州也可能出现类似危机,甚至彻底退出 SNAP。

Highlights

  1. If a state makes too many mistakes, and we're mostly talking small administrative errors, they'll have to pay up to 15% of the benefits. So much money that some states may not be able to keep running the program at all. Can you imagine a state without a food stamp program?

    如果一个州犯了太多错误——而且主要只是些小的行政差错——它就必须承担最高15%的福利支出。这笔钱可能大到让一些州根本无法继续运营该项目。你能想象一个没有食品券项目的州吗?

    Jason DeParle Reveals the reform's existential incentive
  2. It says right here that I have to do the interview by February 28, 2026, but the mailing is dated March 30, 2026. Do I look like I can create a time machine and go back in time? Due to extremely high call volumes, we are not able to accept your call.

    这里明明写着我必须在2026年2月28日前完成面谈,但这封信的日期却是2026年3月30日。难道我看起来能造一台时间机器回到过去吗?由于来电量极高,我们无法接听您的电话。

    Speaker 10 A Kafkaesque example of bureaucratic failure
  3. Now they asked applicants with panhandling income to go back and get written documentation of the money people had dropped in the jars. They knew that there was no way that people could go get that. They rolled their eyes and said, yes, this is absurd, but this is what we have to ...

    现在,他们要求靠乞讨获得收入的申请人回去,为别人投进罐子里的钱取得书面证明。他们明知申请人根本不可能拿到这种证明。他们翻着白眼说,是的,这很荒谬,但我们必须这么做。

    Jason DeParle Shows paperwork designed to be impossible
  4. I can pull it right now, the right date, and I can get it downloaded into the computer and get it done. He said, well, they closed your case, so I can't rework it. It's worth saying that denying eligible people doesn't actually count as a mistake under the new system.

    我现在就能找出日期正确的表格,上传到电脑里把事情办好。他却说,他们已经关闭了你的案件,所以我无法重新处理。值得指出的是,在新制度下,拒绝向符合资格的人发放福利实际上并不算错误。

    Jason DeParle Exposes a devastating asymmetry in the rules
  5. SNAP is the closest thing the United States has to a universal income. It serves the working poor, children, the elderly, and veterans, and it provides a basic commodity, food. I don't think I've ever imagined a landscape in which a SNAP program simply didn't exist.

    SNAP 是美国最接近全民基本收入的制度。它帮助在职贫困者、儿童、老人和退伍军人,并提供最基本的生活物资——食物。我从未想象过一个 SNAP 项目会彻底不存在的社会图景。

    Jason DeParle Frames the nationwide stakes in historic terms
Full transcript

Speaker 2Hi there. Hi. My name is Anna. I'm with the New York Times. We're talking to people about SNAP and what it's like in Arizona right now. Could I ask you a couple of questions in the shade? Yeah. Okay. It's hot out today. I'm Jason DeParle. I'm a reporter for the New York Times. I cover poverty issues and I'm here with my colleagues, Olivia Knatt and Anna Foley. We're outside a food stamp or SNAP office in Phoenix, Arizona.

Jason DeParleI just took a look inside the office. There are people sitting on the floors. There are people in wheelchairs. There are people on crutches. There are people wearing worn out looks of long waits that aren't yet over. How many times do you think you've been to this office? Oh my goodness. And this month and this year? This is going to be like my fifth time. Your fifth time trying to get snapped. Yeah. Come to these places. This is just like work itself.

Natalie KitroeffFrom the New York Times, I'm Natalie Ketroef. This is The Daily. The United States is undergoing one of the biggest changes to its social safety net in recent history, with huge numbers of people dropping out of the government's food assistance program. Nowhere has it been more dramatic than in Arizona. For some reason or another, my food stamps application keeps getting lost, you know, quote unquote lost. I don't have any income.

Natalie KitroeffI don't know no food. Probably homeless in a couple months. How many meals are you eating a day right now? One. One. Today, my colleague Jason DeParle explains why so many people there are suddenly losing access to this key benefit and the implications all this could have for the rest of the country. It's Wednesday, August 5th. Jason.

Natalie KitroeffWe want to talk to you today about these drastic changes that have been made to the food stamp program known as SNAP. When Trump's big, beautiful bill passed about a year ago, we understood that Republicans were planning to pay for it by making cuts to the government's welfare programs. You have been following that story all the way to Arizona. So just walk me through why you went there.

Jason DeParleArizona is the place in the country that's had the largest reduction in food stamps since the passage of the big beautiful bill. The rolls there have fallen in half. 450,000 people have lost nutrition aid there. That's just a huge number. Yes, it includes more than 100,000 children as well. And why is that? Why has the drop off been so steep? The law imposed dramatic changes in the SNAP program, but mostly deferred those changes until after the midterm elections.

Jason DeParleArizona was the state that moved most aggressively to make changes. Jason, just remind us what those changes actually were and the argument that Republicans made for why they needed to implement them. Republicans saw SNAP as a bloated program. It had more than doubled in size since 2000. About one in eight Americans get SNAP and its annual cost had exceeded $100 billion. They thought it needed reining in.

Jason DeParleThey thought it served as a work disincentive. They thought that offering people nutrition aid persuaded some not to work or not to work as much as they could. They were concerned that some people committed fraud to get on it. But those were all longstanding concerns. What really drove the changes last year in Congress was the need for money to finance President Trump's tax cuts, which I think it's worth remembering largely went to the wealthy.

Jason DeParleThe reason they did what they did when they did it was because they wanted money for President Trump's tax cuts. And how do they go about shrinking the program? What do they actually do? The thing that's gotten the most attention, and it's probably the easiest to understand, is that they expanded work requirements. More people...

Jason DeParlehave to work in order to qualify for benefits. It used to be that people 55 and older were exempt. Now they've expanded that up to age 65. So you've got people in their late 50s and early 60s who for the first time face work requirements in order to get SNAP benefits. Got it. But that's not really the main factor in what's driving the caseload declines in Arizona. The thing that's really driving this is a change in how SNAP is funded.

Jason DeParleHistorically, the federal government had paid all the benefits. States paid part of the administrative costs of running a SNAP program, but all the food stamp money came from the federal government. But now this new law says that if a state makes too many mistakes, and we're mostly talking small administrative errors, they'll have to pay up to 15% of the benefits. And in some states, that costs more than a billion dollars a year. Basically, what the federal government is doing, if I understand this correctly, is

Natalie Kitroefftelling the states that if they mess up their payments, they're going to end up shouldering part of the cost of this program. And it could be a lot of money. Yes, they're basically saying, if you can't keep what's known as your error rate down, you'll lose access to a bunch of federal money. So much money that some states may not be able to keep running the program at all. I think that's worth stopping to consider for a moment. I mean, can you imagine a state without a food stamp program?

Jason DeParleSo in order to avoid a $300 million penalty and potentially losing the program altogether, Arizona officials made dramatic changes to the program and the roles instantly began falling. They fell much farther and much faster than Arizona officials imagined. And what we found in our reporting was that these are people who by and large remain eligible for aid but simply can't get it because they're stuck.

Jason DeParlein webs of red tape. Hey, I saw you on the phone earlier. My name's Olivia. I'm here with the New York Times. I'm talking to people about whether or not they're receiving their SNAP benefits. Oh, girl. No. I did everything. Still no help. One of the people caught in that red tape is a woman, my colleague, Olivia Nat, and I met outside a food stamp office in Phoenix. Her name is Alejandra Casillas. I've been applying since December, right? I did that.

Jason DeParleIn January, they had me waiting until February. I can't be calling them all the time because I have a job and kids to take care of. But yeah, I called them at least five times in the morning. She's 28 years old. She's a mother of two. And she's working. But she doesn't make enough to feed her family. She gave us a version of a story we had heard in other places of notices that were impossible to comply with. Mailing that you see that.

Speaker 2March 30, 2026. And it says right here that I have to do the interview by February 28, 2026. So a month after they said, this is the deadline, that's when you got the piece of paper. I'm like, what am I supposed to do? Do I look like I can create a time machine and go back in time? Why was it so hard for her to get her benefits, Jason? Did she explain that?

Jason DeParleOnce you apply for SNAP benefits, you have to have an interview with a special caseworker, and it has to happen within two weeks of the application. But you call in those two weeks and nobody answers. Nobody answers. And tomorrow is the last day that I had to complete my interview, and then they closed the cases too. She couldn't get through on the phone to have the interview. So she left her home, came in to the SNAP office on her day off, and they told her, you can't do the interview here.

Speaker 10You have to call. I can even call it right now too, and they'll drop it. Can we try? Yeah. Welcome to the Department of Economic Security, Family Assistance Administration. To continue in English, press one. We listen to her make the call. Our record show, you need to complete an interview. Due to extremely high call volumes, we are not able to accept your call. We apologize for the inconvenience. That's how it is all the time that we call.

Jason DeParleThat call, like others, went nowhere. They told her she'd just have to wait for a call back. So now here she is in limbo, unable to get access to food stamps. But what really struck me about her was just how angry and defeated she seemed. She told us she'd been going to food banks, that she'd stopped breastfeeding her child because she feared she lacked nutrients. Oh no. I've been thinking about going to a grocery store, just put a whole bunch of food and run out.

Jason DeParleAnd then she said something like really remarkable. She said she'd been having fantasies about stealing food. Hmm. Like I will sign up for insta car as a driver and keep the groceries for my kids. I'm at that point. You know, she wasn't apologetic. She wasn't defiant. She wasn't justifying it. She was just saying. Then I do think it through. I'm like they're pushing me to that point, but my kids need me.

Jason DeParleSo I can't be breaking no laws. So I'm like stuck, you know. Here it is. This is the way I'm living right now. She was really desperate, obviously. Yes. And part of what was remarkable about Alejandra's story is that there was nothing remarkable about it. We heard echoes of that with almost everybody we talked to. I mean, if one or two people tells you a story like that, you can always think, well, maybe it's an extraordinary circumstance, but it was the norm, not the exception in Arizona.

Jason DeParleI have to say, Jason, hearing that and hearing how common it sounds like Alejandro's experience is, it sounds like the system completely broke down, in a sense. How did that happen? It did. It completely broke down. It was a perfect storm. But a lot of it can be traced back to the decision Arizona made to change the paperwork requirements. It used to be that applicants could just walk in the office and tell a caseworker how many people lived in the household and who they were.

Jason DeParleNow applicants had to go to neighbors or friends and get a written declaration of who lived in the household. And if the neighbor or friend failed to sign the letter or failed to put their phone number on the letter, you'd have to start all over again. It used to be if you had panhandling income, you gave the office your best guess of how much you made. Now they asked applicants with panhandling income to go back and get written documentation of the money people had dropped in the jars. What? They knew that there was no way that people could go get that. They said that to us when we talked to them. They rolled their eyes and said, yes, this is absurd, but this is what we have to do. And in the end, if they can't get the written documentation, we'll take their word for it. But we have to make them go out and try. And of course, if you make people go out and try, a lot of them just don't come back.

Jason DeParleAnother thing that made things worse is that Arizona just happened to make a deep cuts in caseworkers at the same time the federal government was passing this bill. So it lost a third of its caseworkers at the very time it was asking people to submit more paperwork. Meaning there were way fewer people working in these offices processing these claims. The staff was just reduced. More paperwork, fewer people to look at it. Yes. Right. And so it's that combination of factors in Arizona that then leads to half a million people suddenly losing their benefits. Yes, and Boyd did affect them in profound ways. People were skipping meals. People were having household quarrels over food. They were selling blood plasma to get money to buy food. They were falling behind on the rent. And remember, these are people who by and large remain eligible for SNAP. That was definitely the case with a woman we met named Dee McDonald. We'll be right back.

Jason DeParleGood morning. Good morning. I just got out of the shower. These are 65 year old grandmother in Mesa, Arizona. Can't be more than five feet tall. She was wearing a knit beret. And that was Tobias. He's going to work. Hi, Tobias. Everybody come in. Hi, Tobias. Oh, thank you. That was your grandson? One of them. I can't swear that she hugged me when I walked in, but it felt like she did. I think she did. Well, make yourself at home. I made this for you. Oh my goodness. Oh, wow.

Jason DeParleWhat a spread. What did you make? Tell us what it is. They're biscuits. They're just biscuits. More than biscuits. We were there to talk to her about food stamps and food insecurity, and she'd spent the previous day baking biscuits and assembling a fruit platter for us. These are churro donuts. I never had a churro donut. They were fantastic. I found them at a very good price, and then I quickly fried them and dunked them in cinnamon sugar.

Jason DeParleThe last thing I wanted to do was to impose on her like that. But that's an expression of who she is. She's a very warm, welcoming, grandmotherly woman. So we sat around her table and she told us about her life. It'd been a pretty exciting life at one point.

Jason DeParlewas a roadie locally. I was unloading trucks, pulling cables, hanging lights, doing all kind of stuff like that. And I started, my first job was boys to men for wardrobe. That's how long ago. She was a kind of roadie. She was a wardrobe technician for traveling rock bands. The quick changes you see, that's what we do. I told Jimmy Buffett, Britney Spears, was asked to tour the Marilyn Manson.

Speaker 11Asked a tour with slipknot she went on tour with Britney Spears and Jimmy Buffett awesome the dream of a lifetime and I was really doing well I worked really hard to get where I where I got to but when she was in her early 40s her son fell into some trouble and That's when like I knew my career was over and she wound up taking care of five

Jason DeParleI had to make a choice. I didn't want them going to the state. They needed family. For a while after taking in the grandkids, she worked. She had a job at a racetrack, among other things. But eventually she needed to spend full time taking care of the grandkids, and she turned to SNAP for help. I felt like it was a way to help us, but I never thought I would be on it forever. I don't want to say forever, for this long.

Jason DeParleAbout 15 years ago she started receiving snap and has been on it since without snap we would have starved we would have starved or Maybe we wouldn't have starved. We would have not Had the proper nutrition for sure. She was receiving about $700 a month in snap aid That's about a third of her income. The rest mostly comes from Social Security. I can I can make it happen on 700 a month with even with them

Speaker 11I was buying four gallons of milk every other day. Four gallons of milk. I mean, it's stretching, but I learned. If I say I'm going big grocery shopping, don't expect to see me for four to six hours. That's what I'm doing. I'm going to the discount store first.

Speaker 11Then I'm going to the bread store and I'm gonna go to the fruit and veggie store I'm gonna see where the sales are and I'm gonna go there and that's what I'm gonna do and then last fall all of a sudden the benefits stopped and why why do they stop what happened? Last fall these benefits were up for renewal once a year people on snap have to go through this well I got a notice that I had to renew which was nothing new and it was October of

Jason DeParle25. Well, what was going on in October 25? Government was shut down. It had always been a matter of fact for her. You submit your income. Her income hadn't changed. You submit your address. Her address hadn't changed. And I thought, great. I've got to renew in the middle of all of this. So I did my application.

Jason DeParleLike I was supposed to do and got it turned in called she found her paperwork in October in the middle of the government shutdown The food stamp program was in disarray nationwide She didn't get an answer and she wasn't particularly worried at that time Everything seemed good and I thought okay It's gonna come in and it didn't come in and then the next month. She didn't get an answer again What happened when you missed your second payment? How did you feel? Angry frustrated

Speaker 11And scared, you know like how many I've got rice and beans, you know, we've got other things But there's gonna come a point where we don't have butter. We don't have milk We're out of cheese the next month. She goes down to the office itself and the lady told me well You're one of many There are people that are still waiting from September and I said what's going on what's happening? And she said well we had

Jason DeParle1,200 workers and they were cut to under nine. And so they were backed up. And she said, hang in there. They're coming. Thanksgiving comes and goes. Christmas comes and goes. It started a new year. My benefits didn't come in January. They didn't. And I was like, something's just not okay here. I started calling, calling, calling, calling. And I couldn't get through. She makes 100 calls in a single month. Still can't get through. And then in mid, about mid February.

Speaker 11I finally reached a real person. The guy says to me, they closed your case. When she finally does in February, they tell her her case has been closed. I said, what? I haven't gotten a letter. I haven't gotten anything on messaging, you know, on the laptop. I haven't gotten anything in the mail. I haven't gotten anything. Why did they close my case? Why? Why is her case closed? The case worker tells her that she submitted the wrong form.

Jason DeParleThat's not right. That's not possible. And I said, hold on, let me pull my stuff and look. And he said, well, that's what I'm seeing. He was very nice. He wasn't rude. I wasn't rude to him. And I pulled my stuff and I said, oh my gosh, I did pull the wrong gate. Do you get a little bit of income from the child welfare system? She submitted an income form from 2024 when she should have submitted an income form from 2025.

Speaker 11She'd never done that before, but this time she made a mistake. I put the wrong date, and I said, okay, I can pull it right now. The right date, and I can get it downloaded into the computer and get it done. And he said, well, they closed your case, so I can't rework it. And I said, aren't we supposed to have 30 days to fix things, to make things right if there's something wrong? And he said, yes, before we were, that's how it worked.

Jason DeParleHe said, let me talk to my supervisor. He came back and he wouldn't let him open. He said his supervisor would not let him reopen my case to correct that document. And with the new changes to SNAP, that mistake was enough to disenroll her from the program. It's worth saying that denying eligible people doesn't actually count as a mistake under the new system. I was very, very angry. I was very angry. I didn't come out of my room for a little bit.

Jason DeParleI was like, why are they doing this to people? Why are they hurting people? You know, I'll survive. You take food out of my mouth, I'll figure it out. But I've got children I'm raising. Children that need to be growing healthy. She realizes she has two choices. She can appeal and try to get that decision overturned. If she does that, she might be able to get all the back benefits from the months of age she's owed.

Jason DeParleOr she can start all over again and file a new application in which case she wouldn't get the back benefits. The very nice case worker she reached on the phone and tried very hard to be helpful told her that she should appeal. So she did. And how did that go? How many times do you think you've called the appeals office? At least once a day. Have you ever reached a person? No. She never heard anything back. It's been five months. She's still waiting.

Jason DeParleDo I think members of Congress in writing the new laws intended to take a snap away from 65-year-old grandmothers because of a casual mistake? No. But the critics said at the time that this kind of bureaucratic gridlock was a foreseeable element of the new rules that they put in place. And in fact, many people warned that these new administrative rules would throw the program into disarray.

Jason DeParleJason it sounds like this is how the federal changes to snap actually can end up forcing people off the program because now states are so incentivized to reduce their errors That they do so perhaps at the cost of actually providing this benefit Exactly if that state had sent D her payment with that incorrect form in its files it would have counted as an error So you can see it becomes much more risky for the state to provide benefits than to simply

Natalie Kitroeffclose the case altogether. So the net effect of all this is that it's become much more difficult for eligible families like Dees to get access to the program even though they're entitled to it. And for the Republicans who advocated for these changes, does a story like Dees give them pause or do they see the system working as they intended? Are they actually encouraged maybe by the notion that the state is taking this seriously and

Jason DeParletrying to take more accountability for how it spends taxpayer money. I don't think anybody's in favor of administrative errors. It's important to keep error rates down in order to make the best use of public resources, to save money, to keep public support for the program. The question is at what cost? For the most part, I think Republicans have celebrated the caseload declines without looking too closely at what's behind them.

Jason DeParleThe top Republican in the Arizona State Senate said there's massive caseload decline because there was massive fraud. Nationally, the rolls are down about four and a half million people or maybe 10% of the people getting snapped have left the rolls. The White House has celebrated this as proof that President Trump's program is working. So has the Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins. Between them, they've argued that the rolls are falling because they're rooting out fraud or barring undocumented immigrants from accessing the program.

Jason DeParleCertainly in a program as large as SNAP, there's always going to be individual fraud. But I haven't seen anything that would suggest wide scale systemic fraud that could explain this kind of caseload decline. Certainly that's not what we saw in Arizona. And I don't think there's evidence of it in other states either. You said that Arizona has been the first to see this kind of impact because it moved so fast to make these changes to comply with the big, beautiful bill.

Jason DeParleAre we expecting to see this dramatic of an effect in other states? I think most people would guess that Arizona is an extreme example, but we don't really know. Nationwide, the rules haven't taken place yet. If you recall, Congress delayed the changes they made till after the midterm elections. So for the most part, we haven't seen the impact of these changes yet. But there are reasons to suspect that other states may respond in similar ways to Arizona. Starting in November, the federal government is going to cut in half the amount of administrative money it gives states to run the program. That could cause states to lay off caseworkers just as Arizona did. Some other states have already had caseload declines of 15 to 20%. Some states have very low error rates and don't need to change much. Some states have extremely high error rates and have to make radical changes to avoid big federal penalties.

Jason DeParleWe don't know enough about how they'll respond, how good their computer systems are or how many caseworkers they have to predict with much confidence how these changes will affect the caseload nationwide. But if you look at Arizona, there's reason to be concerned. Jason, you've been covering poverty for four decades. What are you thinking about this moment, about how significant it is?

Jason DeParleI'm thinking about what an important program SNAP is. SNAP is the closest thing the United States has to a universal income. It serves such a wide variety of people. It serves the working poor. It serves children. It serves the elderly. It serves veterans. And it provides a basic commodity, food. It was clear from the moment the law passed that this was landmark legislation. But I don't think anybody expected the degree of caseload decline that we've seen in Arizona.

Jason DeParleYou know, I've thought about a smaller SNAP program. I've imagined a SNAP program with more work requirements. I've imagined a SNAP program with lower benefits. I don't think I've ever imagined a landscape in which a SNAP program simply didn't exist. And it's just mind boggling to think that these penalties, these costs could be so steep, some states might choose to end the program altogether. That's a real possibility. Well, Jason, thanks for being here. Thank you, Natalie.

Speaker 11What's life been like since your case was closed? It's draining because I get up in the morning and I think what are we gonna have for dinner? What do they have to eat? What do they have to snack on? Do they have breakfast foods? Do they have enough carrots tea? Do they have enough baby tomatoes tea? Do we have enough to make a salad for dinner tonight? When you take a drop of $700 in your budget that you're used to that being the food You then have to figure out where that food's gonna come from

Speaker 12I'm sure there's people that are taking advantage of it. I'm sure there are. But I think it's inhumane to take food from people. What are we doing here? We'll be right back. Here's what else you need to know today. We are in talks with the Iranians and I think there is a chance we may have a deal today or tomorrow to open the straight and move towards a more normalized position in this conflict.

Natalie KitroeffOn Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Besant and Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that negotiations to reopen the Strait of Hormuz are making progress. Under the framework being considered, ships entering the Persian Gulf would have to travel through a channel controlled by Iran, while outbound ships would travel through a channel near Oman. Today's episode was produced by Olivia Natt, Anna Foley, and Carlos Prieto, with help from Ricky Nevetsky.

Natalie KitroeffIt was edited by Mark George, with help from Patricia Willins, and contains music by Pat McCusker, Alicia Beytu, Dan Powell, and Marion Lazano. Our theme music is by Wonderly. This episode was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. That's it for the daily. I'm Natalie Ketroff. See you tomorrow.

Delete this episode?

This removes the episode page and its saved audio from this library.