← All shows

What's That Rash? - Is NAD+ a miracle anti-aging supplement?

Duration 17:29 · Language en · Published Nov 06, 2024 · 5 highlights

Summary

本期节目围绕社交媒体热炒的NAD+与NMN抗衰老补充剂展开,解释了NAD+参与能量代谢、氧化应激、DNA修复和细胞衰老等重要过程。主持人指出,人体内NAD+水平会随年龄下降,但这并不等于它的下降就是衰老的原因,更不意味着补充它就能逆转衰老。动物实验显示,提高NAD+可能改善小鼠的线粒体功能和部分衰老指标,但目前没有可靠证据证明这些效果能在人类身上重现。节目借“吃Vegemite可预防出生缺陷”的媒体误读案例,说明初步的小鼠研究如何被包装成夸张甚至有害的公共健康建议。两位主持人还讨论了人体稳态机制、补充剂吸收方式、合适剂量和肠道微生物组等尚未解决的问题,并强调长期安全性研究严重不足。现有资料只提示NMN可能引起胃肠道副作用,尤其不建议孕期使用,因为其对孕妇和胎儿的影响完全不清楚。最终建议是等待高质量人体研究,不要把希望寄托在“青春之泉”式营销上,而应优先依靠均衡饮食和运动来减缓与衰老相关的生化变化。

Highlights

  1. There is a lot of hype on social media, as always, and the sorts of things that it claims to do: boosting energy levels, boosting concentration and memory, mental clarity. I've also seen claims around hormone balancing, metabolism and inflammation, which I think we need a What's ...

    社交媒体上一如既往地充斥着大量炒作,号称它能提升能量、增强注意力和记忆力、带来更清晰的思维。我还看到过平衡激素、改善代谢和炎症等说法,简直可以做一张《What's That Rash》的营销话术宾果卡了。

    Captures the extraordinary breadth of anti-aging marketing claims
  2. That little whiff of science that might be done in a petri dish or in a mouse model gets blown up into something that's really, really big with lots of promises around it by people who are trying to make money. And they can say that it's grounded in science because in a sense it ...

    培养皿或小鼠模型里那一点点科学苗头,会被想赚钱的人无限放大,包装成充满承诺的大生意。他们还可以声称这一切有科学依据,因为从某种意义上说,它确实沾了点科学的边。

    A sharp explanation of how legitimate science becomes commercial hype
  3. This research paper discovered the mother could be deficient in vitamin B3, niacin, and supplementation prevented birth defects—with 100% success. Very important asterisk: it was research done in mice. So the mothers in question were mice, not humans.

    这篇论文发现,母体可能缺乏维生素B3,也就是烟酸,而补充它以百分之百的成功率预防了出生缺陷。但这里有一个极其重要的附注:研究是在小鼠身上完成的,所谓的“母亲”是母鼠,不是人类。

    A memorable cautionary example about misleading animal-study headlines
  4. There's a thing called homeostasis where one of the reasons why we are such a resilient species is that we've got amazing balance mechanisms in our body. If something happens to our body that knocks us off balance, the body tries very hard to counteract that.

    人体存在一种叫作稳态的机制;人类之所以如此有韧性,原因之一就是身体拥有惊人的平衡系统。任何事情使身体偏离平衡时,它都会竭力进行抵消。

    Explains why simply adding more of a molecule may not produce lasting benefits
  5. We've no idea what long-term use does to you. That simply has not been studied. So great caution, and eat a healthy diet, exercise—we know that those things help to slow down the biochemical processes of aging themselves.

    我们完全不知道长期使用会对人体造成什么影响,因为这根本没有被研究过。因此必须格外谨慎,并坚持健康饮食和运动——我们知道这些做法本身就有助于减缓与衰老相关的生化过程。

    Delivers the episode's clearest evidence-based practical takeaway
Full transcript

ABC Listen, podcasts, radio, news, music and more. So, Norman, it's time for me to test your Australian-ness once more. Yeah. Are you a true Australian? I like to think I am, though. Yes. A bit mixed, but yeah. I mean, I think you've lived in Australia for longer than I have. This is the true test of an Australian, though. Do you like Vegemite? Look, that's a really interesting question, cos I hated Marmite.

That's a controversial opinion. Yeah. So I could not stand it. So I avoided Vegemite thinking it was going to taste like Marmite. And then when I tasted it, I thought, oh, this is pretty good. You must be the only person in history who likes salty, salty, Vegemite more than sweet and salty Marmite, which I think I'll get my citizenship revoked if I say that I like it more. But Marmite is pretty tasty. Yeah. No, no, no, no. Vegemite is just like Australians straightforward.

So the reason we're talking about Marmite and Vegemite specifically today is kind of got nothing to do with what we're talking about, which is kind of the point. And I'll explain it in just a second. Yeah. Is today's mystery on what's that rash where we answer your health questions? So we've actually got a couple of questions on the same topic today, Norman. This week, Sarah says, now that I've hit 40, my social media feeds have turned into a nonstop parade of anti-aging ads. And one of the big buzzwords Sarah seeing making the rounds is NMN supplementation to boost NAD plus production, which claims to slow the aging process. Sarah wants to know, is there any truth in this? And if so, are there long or short term side effects we need to consider? And Jamie has written in a long similar line saying, I saw a video of an influencer injecting something called NAD plus the other day herself claiming it would give her an energy boost and help with anti-aging. Jamie asks, what in the world is NAD plus and is

that safe. Good question. Norman, what in the world is NAD Plus and is it safe? Well, NAD Plus is a chemical involved in energy production, energy management, but also control of oxidative stress where you've got biological resting. It's getting towards one of the more fundamental processes biochemically that make us age. Speed it up or slow it down.

And NAD plus is the key molecule in this cycle of reactions. And you don't take NAD plus itself. You want to try and influence this pathway. That's what people are trying to do is you take what are called boosters or precursors to boost your NAD levels in your cells to affect this biochemical process.

And NMN is one of the things that people take as a booster to try and boost their NAD because it's part of that biochemical cycle. It's a really complex biochemical reaction that we will actually get into. But I think it's good to know what the claims are around this because there is a lot of hype on social media, as always, and the sorts of things that it claims to do, like you kind of alluded to before, boosting energy levels, boosting concentration and memory, mental clarity. I've also seen claims around hormone balancing, metabolism and inflammation, which I think we need a what's that rash bingo card.

basically a whole row of bingo card right there. That's right, without the bell. Yeah, that's it. And then, of course, some news coverage is throwing around the phrase fountain of youth, which is just a giant red flag for me. Exactly. Let's just go to basics here.

It is not controversial to say that this substance called nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, which can exist in two forms, plus another substance called NADH, are part of chemical cycles which do influence the aging process. So that is relatively uncontroversial. The aging process is not fully understood, but we know that, for example, oxidative stress energy metabolism, home mitochondria work, which are the energy factories in cells, all relate to how well our bodies work and how efficiently they work. And what's also not controversial is that as we age, our NEAD plus levels decline in ourselves. But there's so many things that change when we age and it's hard to know which ones are doing something and which ones are just kind of...

declining. Yeah, declining because we're aging, but not driving the aging process. So testosterone declines, for example, in both men and women as we age. The trouble is that when you give testosterone supplements, they don't seem to reverse aging. So is it an effective aging? Just by the fact that we've had more time on this earth that they go down rather than driving the process. Now some people believe that when NAD plus reduces for whatever reason, if you actually could boost it, you would reverse the aging process or slow it down. And that's the key debate. I do think it's interesting that there's obviously research that's happening here. This is an actual molecule that's actually found in bodies and scientists are trying to figure out what its role is.

But what happens in this space often with anything to do with anti-aging or slowing down decay and decline is that that little whiff of science that might be done in a petri dish or in a mouse model gets blown up into something that's really, really big with lots of promises around it by people who are trying to make money. And they can say that it's grounded in science because in a sense it kind of is. Well, that's right. And it's very powerful, this idea here because The NAD plus these biochemical cycles affect how DNA repairs itself, it affects what's called cellular senescence which is how when cells die the dead cells or almost dead cells are dealt with because if they're not cleared from the body quickly or efficiently then they can actually have a toxic effect on the surrounding tissue and increase the aging of tissues.

and also affects how immune cells function. So there's a lot of stuff going on related to these metabolic pathways. So obviously this substance is in people's bodies and we say that it declines with age. How does it get there? Is our body making it? There's two processes.

One is our body can make it for itself out of its own resources using tryptophan and so there's a metabolic cycle which is internal to the body and then there is another one which is called salvage and why it's called salvage is that it salvages a substance called nicotinamide.

which is one of the group of vitamins called B3 vitamins, and it salvages that from the diet and from the body to manufacture NAD+. And that salvage cycle is where the focus is of NAD+, precursors or boosters. So normally we'd be getting these from our diets and then the supplementation is about kind of going, well, can I just stick it straight in my body, either in a pill or an injectable form?

Correct. So people are taking NMN, which is nicotinamide mononucleotide. They're taking it as NR, which is nicotinamide riboside, which is the vitamin to be brief. They're trying to do it through tryptophan, which is the other cycle and nicotinic acid. There are foods which contain these substances such as legumes, tofu, fish, seafood, dairy, and so on. Guess what diet actually might increase your NED plus precursors.

I think I know. This is it. Those are healthy foods. Just eat foods that are good, right? And of course, Vegemite. Well, okay. Let's talk about Vegemite for a second because that was obviously our very confusing start to our chat today. The thing with Vegemite is that it famously, apart from containing a lot of salt, also contains B vitamins and one of those vitamins is B3 and there was a story that I think provides a good cautionary tale a couple of years ago where there was a study that came out of a research institute here in Australia that was talking about birth defects and recurrent miscarriage, hugely distressing for people who have that either losing multiple pregnancies or having a baby that's born with a birth defect and often parents blame themselves and the reasons behind these are often not clear.

And this research paper discovered the mother could be deficient in vitamin B3, niacin, and supplementation prevented birth defects. With 100% success, very important asterisk, it was researched done in mice. So the mothers in question were mice, not humans. But the press around this discovery was...

breathless and very exciting. There were headlines like, could a simple vitamin prevent birth defects? It was very, very hyped. And because vitamin B3 and niacinam are maybe things that aren't kind of in people's normal lexicon in an effort to communicate this to the broad public, people reached for Vegemite as sort of a, the vitamin in Vegemite could be blah, blah, blah. And so what you had on one hand was mice being supplemented with a particular vitamin.

to boost their NAD levels, to the actual message that people got in the community being, eat Vegemite and your baby won't have a birth defect, which is of course completely wrong. You'd have to eat giant amount. And you would have so much salt, which is not good for your health. And so I think of that story as being an important kind of message, I guess, to people like us, Norman, as science communicators, to make sure that in an effort to make something more understandable, you don't accidentally give really bad and maybe harmful advice or false promises.

a really good point. So let's come to this idea of supplementation or precursors of NAD+. So the evidence is when you give large doses of this to your favorite animal, the mouse, you do seem to get changes in energy metabolism, mitochondria seem to work better. There are measures of biochemical aging. They do seem to slow down. So there is some evidence in animal models that boosting NAD levels when they've dropped due to aging can reverse some of these processes. The question is, does it work in humans?

and there's no evidence that it does. You think, oh, well, you know, why is that? Well, it's just that mice are not humans. Mice also only live for a couple of years. We live for a really long time. Like, sometimes often mouse models are really informative to give us a sense of what might happen over a lifetime, but we can't lean on them entirely. No. And it's an artificial situation on genetically selected mice in the laboratory. Here's what we don't know.

about NAD and NMN boosters. So when people get NMN boosters, they're sometimes getting massive doses of NMN boosters. And there's a thing called homeostasis where one of the reasons why we are such a resilient species is that we've got amazing balance mechanisms in our body.

If our blood pressure goes up because we're anxious inside, there's another process for bringing our blood pressure down. If our stress hormones go up, there's a process to counteract them and bring them down. Our body is in balance. And if something happens to our body that knocks us off balance, the body tries very hard to counteract that. NAD+, works at tiny, tiny amounts in our body. And if you're going to boost it through artificial high levels of these boosters, similar to say what animals get in an artificial circumstance. What's quite likely happening is the body's saying, bugger off, you perturb me, I'm going to fight against it. So you might get an initial response over a short period of time, but then that initial response seems to disappear. And it's tantalizing because they should work, but they don't at the moment seem to work. And where the smart money is going with here is

Do you actually need to give tiny doses of NED plus precursors in multiple forms to confuse the body or get in under the body's defences so that you're not shifting the body's homeostatic mechanisms, you're getting in under the surface. And so when you're giving the supplement companies ammunition here to reformulate and probably charge more as well. Well, that's true. But the other problem you've got is taking in a form that the body can use. And they haven't sorted that out either.

There are small studies, there are inadequate studies and we have not got a clue about what the right dose is. But when we do look at animal models, because they are good at giving us hints of where to look more, I suppose, NAD Plus potentially plays a role in things like Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease. Well, it plays a role in everything.

You could find anything that plays a role in. Yeah, sure. It has an effect on brain cells. But the question that we got was, is it dangerous to supplement too much of it? And a little bit of evidence from NMN boosters that maybe you can get gastric side effects.

There's not a lot of evidence of harm, but equally they've not been well studied, and not been well studied over extended periods of time. So on what's that rash? We are not able to say whether it's safe or not. It looks as though they're safe, even in reasonable doses.

But we can't be sure. So flipping it around, one of the claims is that people are taking these supplement... And when I say claims, I'm talking about social media, is that people are deficient in NAD+. What do we know about a deficiency of NAD+. Well, we know in low-income countries where their diet is specifically from maize that they can become vitamin B deficient, particularly B3 deficient, and they can get a terrible condition called polygra.

and that does affect multiple organ systems and is a serious vitamin deficiency. And we know that NAD levels go down with aging but that doesn't mean that you're NAD deficient. It may mean that for your age you've got the right levels of NAD in your body. We don't know whether or not that's a good thing or a bad thing to have low NAD plus levels as you get older. The assumption is that it's bad and associated with the damage of aging but it may not be. And also we don't know the effects of the gut microbiome.

is that when you swallow one of these substances, do the bugs in your bowel have an effect on its absorption or even its transformation? Or is it juicing up those bugs? Exactly. If it's doing work inside cells. You might have aging bugs in your microbiome and it tarts them up. The fountain of youth for your gut bugs. We love it. Yeah. So to come back to Jamie and Sarah's questions, is there anything in this idea of NID plus supplementation?

My belief is there will be in the future with a very different pattern to what we've got now. And if you're going to take this, you should certainly not take it in pregnancy because you've got no idea what's going to happen there. We've no idea what long-term use does to you. That simply has not been studied. So great caution and eat a healthy diet, exercise.

And we know that those things help to slow down the biochemical processes of aging themselves. Yeah, our healthy, well-rounded diet is probably giving us all of the NID precursors that we need. At least according to current research. Maybe in the future we'll have something, a little cocktail we could take, but we don't know what that is yet.

Yeah, I'm going to be waiting for the human studies. I'm not pinning everything on mouse studies personally. No, no, no. So if you have a question for us, be like Sarah and Jamie and send it to us. We are that rash at abc.net.au. And it is also the place where you can send us your thoughts about things that we have spoken about in the past. And a couple of people Norman have written in about hay fever cures, which is of course what we were talking about just the other day.

Yeah, Christopher writes, I used to have really bad hay fever, but I've made some changes to my life around springtime that have made a world of difference and may benefit your listeners, so that rashes. One, dry my clothes in the tumble dryer during springtime to avoid pollen getting onto my clothes. Drinking kombucha a few times a week and eating yogurt or kimchi to build up a variety of good gut bacteria, wearing an N95 mask during particularly bad days, and an air purifier.

So three out of the four of those sound very straightforward to me. I'm really curious as to what we think about the kombucha kimchi yogurt intervention. I'm going to take two on notice because I think, you know, we've done what's that rash on apple cider vinegar, in other words fermented foods. I think we should do one on kombucha yogurt and kimchi just to see whether or not.

There's a difference there. So I think stay tuned for a future. What's that rash? So it's funny that you mentioned apple cider vinegar because Susan has also suffered from hay fever for decades and has used all sorts of medications. But she did hear on the ABC science show a few years ago that taking a teaspoon of apple cider vinegar with the mother each day in a glass of water would help manage her symptoms. And for her, she says it does work and she only takes antihistamine on pollen storm days.

Well, I think we're going to have to put that back into the what's that rash mix. We now got two who are getting a benefit from fermented products, they say from hay fever.

Two doesn't make evidence, but it's really interesting. So let's follow that up. Well, if you have, I think Norman this week, we should ask people for their anti-aging cures. Absolutely. What are you doing to reverse the aging process? Send us your anti-aging cures to that rash at abc.net.au. And I can't wait to read them. We'll see you next time. See you then.

Delete this episode?

This removes the episode page and its saved audio from this library.