Women at Work - How to Manage: Executing Strategy
Summary
本期节目探讨中层管理者如何把高层战略转化为团队能够理解、执行并持续调整的具体方向。嘉宾指出,战略执行尤其为女性管理者提供了展示商业敏锐度的机会,但高效完成任务也可能让她们被固化为“执行者”,而非具有全局思维的战略领导者。面对模糊或抽象的战略,管理者不应立即制定行动清单,而要反复研读、追问背后的商业动因,并厘清增长质量、跨部门影响和成功标准。要争取参与战略制定,可以申请旁听、强调自己掌握的一线运营信息,或在关键节点向领导提供风险与历史经验。推动团队接受变化时,管理者需要正视过去失败留下的包袱和员工对岗位前景的担忧,以行动证明自己会为团队清除障碍,而不是简单要求大家服从。节目还强调,每个部门都应形成支持公司目标的自身战略,因为预算和项目列表无法替代对取舍、流程及跨部门协作方式的系统设计。当战略失效或需要转向时,应尽早诊断根因、让团队共同提出修正方案并坦诚汇报;真实案例也表明,把改变与员工的职业成长和个人收益连接起来,往往能把抵触转化为投入与热情。
Highlights
-
Women tend to execute very, very effectively and efficiently, and that can be kind of a trap, because once you are the one that's seen as getting it done, you're not seen as the one that's thinking strategically. We get stuck in tactical mode, and once that strategy is delivered, ...
女性往往执行得非常高效、出色,但这也可能成为一种陷阱:一旦你被视为那个能把事情做成的人,别人就不再把你看作进行战略思考的人。我们会陷入战术模式,战略一发布就立刻制定项目和计划,而这只会让领导层把我们定位为执行者,而不是有远见的人。
Exposes the hidden downside of being known as a great executor -
The first thing you shouldn't do is hit the ground running after that big town hall presentation where everybody gets excited. The first thing you have to understand is: I don't have enough information. Take that strategy and read it in detail many times over; start thinking abou ...
在那场让所有人都很兴奋的全员大会之后,最不该做的第一件事就是马上冲出去行动。你首先必须明白:我掌握的信息还不够。要把战略拿来反复仔细阅读,思考自己有哪些问题,以及其中可能存在哪些缺口。
A counterintuitive warning against rushing into execution -
The best strategy is not just about what you're choosing to do, but what you're choosing not to do. Identify the historical baggage that probably resides within your team and within the company—there have been strategies before, and things have happened either successfully or uns ...
最好的战略不仅关乎你选择做什么,也关乎你选择不做什么。要识别团队和公司内部可能存在的历史包袱——过去也推行过战略,而且结果有成功也有失败。无论你认为那些担忧合理还是琐碎,都必须找出它们并主动应对。
Connects strategic choice with the emotional history of change -
Many organizations may have business plans for specific departments and, of course, budgets, but they're not strategies. They're just a list of initiatives and tactics and projects; they haven't really translated that corporate strategy into something that their department can de ...
许多组织可能为各部门制定了业务计划,当然也有预算,但那些并不是战略。它们只是项目、战术和任务的清单,并没有真正把公司战略翻译成部门能够据此设计配套战略的内容。这种模糊性会让各部门的努力沦为一堆杂乱项目,或只是把一直以来的旧做法重新包装。
Sharp distinction between a real strategy and a project list -
All our tests were manual, so I needed to completely change the strategy to introduce automation. I got job descriptions in the market and salary ranges for a manual QA as opposed to an automation QA; it demonstrated that for their career it was a step up, also for the salary. Wh ...
我们所有的测试原本都是手工完成的,所以我必须彻底改变战略,引入自动化。我找来了市场上的职位描述,以及手工测试工程师与自动化测试工程师的薪资区间;这些资料证明,无论对职业发展还是薪资而言,这都是一次提升。当他们开始写代码并看到它如何运作后,便真正投入了进去,其中一人还去大学修读了一个学期的课程。
Memorable example of turning resistance into career motivation
Full transcript
You're listening to Women at Work from Harvard Business Review. I'm Amy Bernstein. When I think of what I do every single day in my work, it really comes down to moving the teams I oversee toward our strategic goals. You know, I make decisions about priorities and about how people are spending their time. I give guidance on which direction to take on any given project. But everything is really always about Making sure everyone knows where we're going and that we're all in sync getting there. Getting teams to move in sync as you probably know can be super challenging. And my personal style was meet with the team weekly and it was a big whiteboard of what's going right and what's not and what do you need.
Andrea Belk Olson is a strategy consultant who's written for HBR about the challenges executing a strategy presents for mid-level managers, like when the plan seems vague or uninspired or unattainable. She's also written about the opportunities carrying out the master plan can present, which she and I'll cover from the beginning to the end of our conversation.
She'll advise on how to get clarity when there isn't enough and how to address employee skepticism. She'll also suggest ways to get people to pay attention to and care about your progress updates. Mid-level managers are the ones who, as Andrea writes, can make or break the plan. So let's make the plan, okay? Because being proactive and deliberate instead of simply going through the motions is the right and, frankly, more interesting thing to do. And it's what the company expects of us. Andrea, it's always seemed to me that strategy execution is where mid-level managers can shine. You know, it's where you can demonstrate that you as a mid-level leader really grok.
the goals and the vision of the organization's leadership and that you are able to mobilize and inspire a team to achieve those goals. How do you see that particular role in strategy execution, the role of the mid-level manager? I think it's often underutilized and that strategy execution really is kind of this bigger, greater opportunity, especially for women.
to elevate their business acumen, like diving into actually how the broader business operates on a higher level. And I think this means really learning the economics behind, let's say, any corporate strategy, you know, understanding why certain decisions were made and how they drive that bigger picture success. And I mean, oftentimes as a mid-level manager, that longer, bigger arc is hard to see.
because you don't have transparency and insight to some of the details behind those decisions. You know, maybe it's the macroeconomic climate or competitor inroads or things along those lines. But really, successfully understanding strategy and successful strategy execution really requires mid-level managers to start thinking and speaking, I think in the mindset and language of a business leader.
you know, and that's not just focusing on execution solely and the tactics and initiatives thereof but taking more of a business decision mindset and thinking strategically yourself on how to drive key choices. So you said that this is an opportunity especially for women because they get to demonstrate or to hone their business acumen. Is that a particularly troublesome area for women in this role?
think it crosses both genders but I think traditionally it does fall kind of in a women's camp because you know stereotypes abound you know women tend to execute very very effectively and efficiently and that can be kind of a trap because once you are the one that's seen as getting it done you're not seen as the one that's thinking strategically and I think that there's kind of three big traps that women especially fall into in this arena and really one is hyper focusing on the deliverables and not the outcomes right so we get stuck in tactical mode and and once that strategy is delivered you know we immediately devise initiatives and plans and and that just positions us as the doer and not the the visionary in the eyes of leadership. I think number two.
is really not having an understanding of the strategic goals and objectives within your sphere of influences context, meaning those objectives are often broad abstract obscure and they don't really provide direction and i'll give you a good example when i was a mid-level manager back gosh 1520 years ago now and a multinational corporation are.
Organization developed a strategic goal that focused on 15% revenue growth across the board. And so this goal insinuated that growth could come from anywhere. But growth actually couldn't come from anywhere. There were some areas of the business that we had great succession that were quite saturated when there were other areas that were untapped and had bigger potential.
And so we kind of lose sight of that when we want to just jump into action without looking back at the context. The third thing I think is a trap that we fall into is being stuck in the proverbial, this is the way we've always done it mindset. And we're all susceptible to status quo bias. But, you know, a new strategy might require us to have new activities and perspectives that the old strategies or the old approaches really aren't suitable for this new situation. And it might require a new way of thinking or entirely different approach. And sometimes that like fear of change, that fear of the new can really put us in a state of inertia. So one of the questions I always ask myself when I am trying to mobilize a team that I oversee to execute on a strategy, particularly a new strategy is
Do I really understand what's shaping this strategy because I you know, I haven't always and it has always led to tears What other questions should a mid-level manager ask herself as she's thinking about executing on a strategy, you know to your point and what we alluded to before is the first thing you shouldn't do is hit the ground running after that, you know, big town hall presentation where everybody gets excited and they've kind of got this elevation and motivation and you want to start going and doing. The first thing you have to understand is I don't have enough information. I have a very high level overview of a bunch of generalities. So I'd say the first step is to take that strategy.
and read it in detail many times over. Start thinking about questions you have, start thinking about gaps that you think are there. I'd say the next step is to really try to fully understand the motivations and objectives behind the strategy, as you alluded to, not just the numbers, but the why. What is driving this change? And then determine what data and insights you need to provide clarity, right? So for instance, if let's say going back the...
Again, the strategy talks about growth and aggregate. Where should that growth come from? What would be considered good growth versus bad growth, right? Profitable growth versus growth that might not be profitable. And what information do you need to really determine that? And of course, you need to identify where you can source that information.
And that may be research that might be studies that might be internal resources or even different departments within the organization. So one thing that I have found as a mid-level manager is that when the strategy is either vague or too high level for me to know exactly how to implement how to execute on it. I have.
thought it through, done some of the work that you just described. And then I always play back my plan to my boss before I do anything and ask, how does this sound? Because I find that that, well, A, my boss is closer to the strategy making than I am often, but also it helps to get that insight from him, honestly. So I wonder if you have other advice for our listeners who are trying to absorb the strategy, understand what it means for the team and plot a road forward. It's very important to not assume certain things. So your approach of kind of getting a litmus test from your boss of, this is how I interpret this. What do you think about this? I'm looking for feedback is fantastic.
I also think it's very important to start with questions. Showing that you've read it, you understand it, and that those questions are, again, very business-minded. You're looking at the bigger picture, not just solely your department or your department's position within the organization, or even what assumptions you might be making on what the strategy has and how it impacts your department. You're looking at the bigger picture. So for example, you might have questions about what success looks like. And let's say you're heading a marketing team and you say, okay, great, we could put together a few campaigns, we can do some tactical things and really get growth up. But a strategic question would be, how would this impact other departments? If we had a huge influx of new customers, would finance or customer service be able to manage that?
you know, has the strategic team taken a look at that and give me some insight on, you know, how that's being addressed. So you're looking at it from a broader operational perspective and not solely your own. You know, when we have published, HBR has published a lot on the importance of buy-in when you're executing on a strategy. And sometimes I have felt and I know other mid-level managers have felt that It's hard to buy into something that you don't understand because you weren't part of it. You weren't part of the strategy making. How do you advise mid-level managers to get involved if they're not invited into the conversation? Any thoughts there? Yeah, it's hard because this really all depends on your organizational culture. I mean, I've worked in environments in the past where
mid-level managers were just intentionally left out of the strategic development process. And then there were cases where strategy design was a very immersive and collaborative process. So it's important to consider what your organizational culture will tolerate. But I think there's a few things you can do in pretty much any situation. Number one, you can ask to participate as an observer.
So you can use this as a learning opportunity, especially if there's certain internal limitations in regards to organizational culture. Two, you could ask to participate and emphasize that you can bring to the table internal historical and operational insights and help the organization really identify unforeseen risks. So you're kind of positioning yourself again as looking at the bigger picture. And this could be things that are.
resource based, infrastructure based, culturally based, it really spreads the gamut. Thirdly, another way to do it is you can ask to participate at key times. So maybe there's points in the strategic development process where leadership really wants to keep this amongst themselves. But there's surely certain milestones where they've crossed a threshold that maybe you can attend and provide the opportunity to give key observations and insights. But, you know, worst case, you could ask your boss, you can ask your superior for a quick meeting debrief on the strategy process at select times. So you can kind of get that feedback maybe indirectly if no other avenues are open. Right. You know, you've got nothing to lose by going to your boss and saying, I bet the
strategy conversations are going to hit this part of the organization or this part of the operation. And I'd be very happy to help you understand it at the ground level if that would be helpful to you, you know. Right. Articulate the value you think you could bring. Exactly. And it has to be at that same strategic level. So what if, you know, you've attended the town hall and you hear this strategy.
you are not wowed by it. It's not differentiating in your view. It's not really all that different from the old strategy, whatever. You're having a little trouble feeling enthusiastic about it. How do you then sell it to your team? I can't tell you how many times I've personally and even indirectly faced that challenge of perverbally putting lipstick on a pig.
you know, they've changed the name, they've changed the logo or the tagline and now it's a new strategy when really it fundamentally is no different than before. But it's true that some strategies actually aren't focused on differentiation. And that's okay. I mean, a strategy can be designed for a wide variety of reasons. Anything from gaining market share and let's say certain business segments to maybe shifting organizational focus to certain operational or technical risks within the company. So even if you think that strategy isn't all that great, it's really important to communicate to your team and understand yourself that underlying thought process behind it. So what are those specific business challenges that it's meant to address? What is the why behind it? And that's a great conversation to have with someone who was closer.
to the strategy making. I mean, I have been there in the past and I've learned that if you're not super enthusiastic about it, chances are you've missed something and it's up to you to figure it out. Right, right. I would say if someone asked me this question, don't just sit with this dissatisfaction. Get underneath the strategy. Talk to someone on your executive committee.
about it and just ask constructive questions with the assumption that you've missed something before you give up on it. Right. Because oftentimes that strategy document, whatever form it takes, can be an oversimplification of what the strategy really means.
People tend to try to fill in the gaps with their own assumptions, right? And there were there were big decisions made behind the scenes because really the best strategy is not just about what you're choosing to do, but what you're choosing not to do. And so it's very important to understand why those decisions were made and really what those bigger objectives are. Yeah, yeah, 100%. Now, There's another thing that I think happens. I'd love to get your view on this. So you yourself, the mid-level manager, you're buying in, you get it, you think it's right, but you're having a lot of trouble motivating your team, sparking their enthusiasm. What do you say to that mid-level manager? Well, the first thing I would say not to do is tell them to suck it up, right? Even though, you know, you've bought in, but...
You've had probably time and commitment to digest it, ask questions, think about it. So you have this deeper understanding of it, much more than they do. And so the important thing is to identify the historical baggage that probably resides within your team and within the company. And what I mean by this is there's been strategies before. Things have happened either successfully or unsuccessfully.
this all influences their acceptance of change. So these are these are cognitive obstacles that definitely stall any new strategy implementation. So it's important whether you feel they're a logical or petty to really identify what those are and proactively address them. It's important to give those concerns and perceptions legitimacy and not just Yep. Yep. I understand. I hear you because that's really just lip service. It's about finding specific things you can do to genuinely address what they perceive as a potential risk concern and sometimes even a concern for the future of their job. If some of these strategies may have a personal impact on them. So it sounds as if you need to have the deeper conversation to understand.
where the resistance is coming from, if it's in fact resistance and not simply apathy. Right. Or just simply fear of change. Well, which we all have. We are human beings. So I was talking to a colleague a little while ago about her feeling that women feel a particular responsibility to sell, to persuade their teams, their direct reports that the strategy is sound.
Does that comport with your experience? You know, personally, yes. I worked in an environment many years ago. I was the only female on an all male executive team. So there was a very different atmosphere to contend with. And I think that the question you pose is really partially driven by this antiquated perception that women are less assertive.
I think that there might be a perception that we need to be pressured to ensure our team is backing us. And maybe this ties to the fact that we're seen as more empathetic and that can be misconstrued as folding to pushback. But men, at least from my experience, not all their team members were on board sometimes. And what I found...
was the difference in acceptance was the confidence your team had in your ability to go to bat for them. They didn't have to accept the entire strategy. They knew that there were going to be challenges, but they wanted the confidence that if faced with that challenge, you would be the one to say, I'm going to help overcome that for you and clear the roadway. And I believe that that's really the big difference. How do you communicate?
that message, that you're there as their champion, that you're going to clear the roadway, whatever is needed in that moment. I think the first thing is you have to prove it through action. And that can start with small wins, things that start building that confidence and trust.
and move all the way to those big things that maybe seem to be immovable objects. And so you have to have some creativity on how you approach that. And then have that two-way communication of saying, maybe there is an immovable object, but there's a lot of ways to handle it. Maybe it's a timing issue. Maybe it's something where we have to shuffle people around into different roles to kind of get rid of this obstacle.
and have transparency to what that process looks like and how you're approaching it. So they're going to have a lot of trust in you when they feel that they're not only involved with the process, but they're heard and they understand you're actively taking the steps to clear that pathway for them. So I have sometimes veered a little too far into taking on my team's upset.
their fear. I get why people are resistant to change. I have felt it myself. And one thing I've kind of learned to do was before I make a serious commitment, one way or the other, I give myself a chance to walk away and think about it and think about the implications. I don't agree to push back immediately if I can identify that that agreement is coming from a place of empathy and not something more strategic. Is this the right thing to do for the organization? I try to identify a better way to handle the upset, but that takes, for me, it takes walking out of the room and taking a breath. Any thoughts about that approach? I think it's a fantastic approach. And I mean this in the best possible way, but I almost perceive it in the sense of raising a child.
So if you have a child that's upset, you want them to stop and try to think about and articulate why they're upset. And sometimes we want to react and try to make things better immediately. But that exercise in truly sitting down and articulating what is bothering you and why and working through that mental logic applies to adults just as well. And it starts with ensuring that they can.
explicitly state what their concern is and then what impact they think that problem may have so now they're kind of working through that process right and that opens the door for discussing a variety of different solutions for it but if you're emotionally wound up into it I fully agree that you need to stop.
Take a moment and really think about the context and think about how you want to approach that conversation. Then I want to explore this with you. What happens when someone on your team really, I mean, you've talked this through. You've tried to get underneath the fear, the anxiety. I know you're not supposed to say suck it up. What comes before suck it up? You know, I think that what comes before suck it up is.
What do you think we should do? Put the onus on the other person to say, I feel your concerns. I understand them. I can even articulate them back to you so you truly understand that I know what you mean. But I'm not the sole person with all the answers. I really do need your participation insight experience to provide me some suggestions that maybe we even can collaborate on.
But I think the important thing is that with frustration, some people want instant gratification. And so no matter how a solution is found, that there sometimes requires some patience. And it's important to, if that process is going to be long to check back in with them, help them understand that this isn't an overnight deal, really. And that as long as they're respected and heard and they're not hopefully ignored, you know, and it gets pushed under the rug, you're actively engaging with them and haven't forgotten. I believe that that confidence and respect will, will retain. I sure hope so. Um, so I got to read your article three reasons why every department needs its own strategy and, you know, yes, yes, I wanted to stand up and cheer. You're absolutely right. And I wonder if you could just show us how this has played out.
In real life can you give us some examples of women who have taken their company strategy. And brought it down to their teams level spelled out what it means and made that work. Oh yes yes you know and I'm shocked as well that many organizations don't do this they may have business plans.
for specific departments and of course budgets, but they're not strategies. They're just a list of initiatives and tactics and projects. They haven't really translated that corporate strategy into something that their department can really design their own supporting strategy around. I mean, a great example is client we had had a corporate strategy that said we will differentiate through superior customer service. But The question for every single department is, what is superior customer service? What should be done differently that's not done today? Or what should be eliminated, continued or expanded? And that ambiguity leads to every department's efforts just becoming that grab bag of initiatives or just repackaging the old things that they've always done. So really a supporting strategy is that
translation. And we had a client mid-level manager, large multi-billion dollar financial institution, and a new corporate strategy had just been rolled out. They wanted to focus on a set of specific products and services as their opportunity to grow. And so what happened is this department had, she was in a service area that was a series of supplemental services that complemented these products.
and she actually took the initiative to develop a supporting strategy with her entire team. They met for about six weeks, a few times a week, and identified ways to streamline and enhance the customer experience surrounding the purchase and use of these products. That really helped them uncover specific operational and process things that were if she took an action that touched another department, oftentimes there was a hiccup or a gap. So because they worked through their strategy, they could identify those things, bring that to customer service or maybe product development and say, this is what we'd like to achieve, but we need your help here too. And that department may say, yeah, that's been a problem for us for quite some time.
gave them the opportunity to work together and solve something that wasn't just a superficial fix to make things better and grow and achieve the corporate strategy, but actually really address the infrastructure that was impacting that greater success goal. So you've been given a new strategy. You've really done the work to understand it. You've gotten your team to help.
articulate what the strategy means for their work, buy in all around enthusiasm even, and six months a year into it, it's not working. What do you do then? I mean, I, because I'm built the way I am, would immediately blame myself. But, you know, maybe that's not the right way and not the most constructive way forward. What do you do? Well, it's possible it might be your problem. It's possible it might not be your problem.
I believe that at the end of the day, it is because when a strategy isn't getting traction, the blame game comes into play. Another client we worked with had churned through a bunch of strategies over a six-month year period with little success. And what naturally happened?
pointed the finger at each other saying that department's the reason this department's the reason it caused a lot of internal turmoil it amplified posturing and internal competition so. You can say well it wasn't us we've checked all our boxes but it doesn't mean that that is not going to impact overall organizational culture and organizational success at the end of the day so i think it's important.
For mid-level managers to see if if something is not working six months a year is a long time That's a lot of energy resources and money Speak up early if something's not hitting the mark I mean think about and try to identify what those possible causes are what are possible proposed solutions what can change that trajectory because I believe that if someone isn't actively engaging and communicating what they're doing in regards to strategy, communicating positive outcomes or causes for concern that really you may become the fall guy, depending on the organization's politics. All right, so no one likes to communicate bad news. How do I as a mid-level manager tell my manager that this isn't working? What do I say?
Well, I think you have to put yourself in the shoes of that upper level manager. And so it's important first to try to identify the problem as early on as possible before it becomes a massive problem. Now your communication is, oh, you know, this isn't working that great, but it's not the end of the world. The second thing is that you have to present the fact that you have thought this through you've really identified root cause you're taking corrective action what's the timeline on that corrective action what is your next step and transparency to if that doesn't work then what. It shows that you've had not only insight but foresight as to what is going on with your department what is not working you have your finger on the pulse and your proactively addressing the.
the issue. So I think that sometimes when you have to deliver bad news, it does not have to be so bad if you can effectively mitigate that. I just want to press on one thing you said because it seems so important. You really have to diagnose what's going on. And that's a great opportunity to bring the team in because they have insight you don't have. So you'll learn and you'll get to a better answer. But it also says very clearly to them.
I'm not pointing fingers for figuring this out together. Exactly. To assume that you have all the answers just because you're the manager or the department leader is very presumptuous. So when we talk about communication, my personal style was meet with the team weekly. A big whiteboard of what's going right and what's not. What do you need to make it right? Because hiccups happen. Things slow down. Something is not delivered on time. And that's going to be the way business operates sometimes. Right. So let's talk about the other side of this communication. Your team is just firing on all cylinders. The plan is working and you're achieving the growth. You've penetrated the new market or whatever your team's piece of the new strategy is. How do you communicate that in a way that
Well, there's peril there and I wonder if you'd sort of talk about the peril and then how to avoid the peril Oh, I you know, I can tell you from firsthand experience as a 20-something year old that's eager to try to accomplish so many things that you know I overstepped my bounds. So give us an example. What'd you say? There was times where I was in a broader management meeting and I wanted to share all the accomplishments my team had done and so was my turn to speak and i had this very long laundry list of we got this we got this we did this on time this came under budget you know and you're you're expecting that big at a boy when culturally speaking to be totally honest whether it's legitimate or not it can make others look bad. And so there's that undercurrent of now now i don't look like i'm doing as well.
And then that kind of can build resentment. So I think you have to make sure that you're not positioning your accomplishments in a way that's about solely you or the team. We launched this campaign, it had X number of likes, etc, etc. These are things that only that department is going to appreciate. Other departments want to know how that impacts me. How does that impact what I'm trying to achieve?
Again, it's about the business overall, it's about growing the organization. And those report outs, those discussions of what you're accomplishing, it needs to show what you've accomplished in the framework, in the context of the strategy. It needs to show you what are potential risks that you see coming down the line. And then also it gives you the opportunity to say, we're collaborating with customer service to make sure that that Speed and pace of let's say a specific initiative is not going to overwhelm them that we can sustain the highest level of service while continuing to grow it's that consideration and I think the more visual the better. Something that's graphically oriented something that's easy to skim something that you know what you call an executive memo right if you treat other department leaders like executives.
They're going to really appreciate the fact that you're respecting their time by not giving them a 20-page document on all the things you've gotten done. Andrea, you're fabulous. Thank you so much. This was a real pleasure. Of course. Thank you anytime. My colleagues Jennifer Long and Gabriela Spattalizano are back after their Women at Work debut last episode. Welcome back. Great to be here. Thank you for having me.
Can we start by talking about what happens when you actually doubt the strategy? What do you do, Jen? How do you even raise that? How do you talk to your manager or your stakeholders about it? I mean, I've been on the receiving end of your argument. Yes, you have.
I have a very current story actually. I mean, I've been on a project executing a strategy that I was am really excited about, you know, really new learning approach, very, very excited about it. And we've been working on it for about a year. And in the course of working on it, new things happened in the market. We learned what it would actually take to execute on this strategy. We did some more research and realized we wanted to get something to market more quickly. And so, there's an effort to sort of not throw the strategy out but reshape it. Reshape it in a way that would allow us to go faster and still maintain. But when this new strategy was first presented to me, I was not on board with it because I was so excited about the original vision. I just felt like we were losing some of the specialness, losing some of the exciting differentiating ideas that we were working on. And what I had to do was less
Last about convincing the leadership team and more almost convincing myself and then being able to come back with some specific things that I thought we could tweak that wouldn't work. But I remember you're bringing up some user testing we had done to argue for one particular feature of this product. Yes, I did come back and make some arguments to maintain some of the features. I also went away and actually I had to get into the weeds we were talking at this sort of conceptual level and I was skeptical and so I had to go I went away for a week and actually Built out a model of what this new vision could look like like spent time Designing I'm being a learning designer like what might this look like and what could work of this new idea? I sort of forced myself and then
What happened is I started to get really excited about the new idea because there was some flexibility. There were some things that being proposed that I was even more convinced wouldn't work. And I was able to go back and say, I don't think this will work, but we could do it this way and still achieve. And that was very powerful because I heard part of that conversation. And to me, that was a form of really hands-on analysis, you know, where you broke down the original concept.
and you rebuilt it to see if, given what you know about how to do this and what our learners want, would this work? And then I thought, I felt that you were bought in. Totally bought in. Now I'm actually more excited about the new strategy and what was good about taking the time to step back and sell myself and dig into it is that now I'm in a much better position to help my team pivot because they've been running on the same track I was running on and now I've got a help them shift to a new trend. Okay, let's talk about that. So any change is going to prompt skepticism, right? Any kind of strategic change. It can run the gamut from a great another strategic shift, that kind of skepticism to the deep objection based on experience data, whatever. Well, it did happen to me that an entire team reacted violently against my strategy. And I knew, as you say, I mean, the obstacle was
they are uncomfortable or changing. All our tests was manual, so I needed to completely change the strategy to introduce automation. And automation is a big challenge because you require different set of mind for tests, but require also to learn a computer programming skill to write code. And for them, it was a challenge. They need to go back and learning and doing differently what they've been very comfortable doing all along.
So I was pretty desperate because how can you do an automation when people don't learn how to write the code? But then one element that I think is human that I play with is everybody think, OK, that's the strategy that Gabriella wanted, but what's in for me? What does he get? Right? I have to do all this. So I got.
Job description in the market the from HR also salary range of what is a manual QA? I suppose as an automation QA it demonstrated that if for their career was a step up also for the salary because it's true now there is the trend in the industry that there is a more and more demand for automation QA Yeah, so that's that was the argument that I use and say it's good for you It's not only good for the company school for you two of them when they started to write the code and see how it works that they get actually into. And one of them went to take a semester class in the university. Oh, I want to do programming. So the passion and I'm also like this. I drive a lot of argument with data, but also with passion because we are human. We are no machine. So let the team buy in and the strategy for me means also
an emotional aspect. That's exciting. I'm gonna do something fun. And then we can buy in any strategy. Well, that's what happened to me. I had to get excited about it and then conveying that excitement to the team and hoping they... So what if you don't get excited about the strategy and you still have to mobilize your team? What do you do then? That's harder. I try to find something to get excited about because There's a business reality sometimes. Maybe it's not as exciting or sexy or fun, but there's sometimes just a business mandate. And honestly, in the spirit of transparency, sometimes I share that with my team. I mean, I won't say, I don't agree with this, but I will say I understand this isn't the most exciting project, but the reality is we need to do it. And again, it's about the benefits. And here's why. Here's how it's gonna benefit the company, us, you.
short-term long-term and and there will be other more exciting pieces coming down the road. So sometimes to me, there's just a reality. Well, you're right. It's even if it's not excited, but if there is a success, so we are success driven, right? What is a more excited? They think that would be a success. The company make more money. So my salary on my bonuses. So I think if we are success driven, the excitement will come.
Yeah, because for me, sometimes, you know, it's not even about excitement or lack of excitement. Sometimes it's just, I'm just skeptical. I'm not sure this will work out the way we hope it'll work out. And so what I find very tricky is when I get that same skepticism from my team, you know, they're casting a skeptical eye on the new articulated strategy and you kind of share their view. I don't know. I'm sort of with you, Jen. I feel like I can't lie. I can't pretend that I'm just jazzed about this new idea. But what I will say is, I hear you, I get it. Let's do what we're supposed to do until we see a better way to do it. Absolutely. And even if I understand the rationale behind it, sometimes I can go there. I get it. I share some of your concerns. Here's where the leadership team is coming from. But I can't be, I can't pretend.
You guys are such naturals. Thank you for joining me again. Thank you. Thank you. For more advice from experts like Andrea, check out the HBR guide to executing your strategy. It's filled with tips for communicating the plan, maintaining momentum, and course correcting when necessary. For more podcast episodes like this one, search whatever app you're using for HBR on strategy.
It's curated listening from the archives of other HBR shows like IdeaCast. The feed is currently about 60 episodes long and growing. Women at Work's editorial and production team is Amanda Cursey, Maureen Hoek, Tina Toby Mack, Rob Eckhart, Ian Fox, and Hannah Bates, who's producing this season. Robin Moore composed our theme music.
Next week, is there an idea you have for changing how your company does business or an idea for bringing in business? Have you struggled to get senior executives to buy into it or even pay attention? Michigan Ross professor Sue Ashford knows how to get the boss to buy in. It's a skill she calls issue selling. She'll lay out not only the steps but also the frames of mind that'll keep you going.
At some point if the issue is important enough you have to be willing to risk being annoying. My colleague and friend Ellen Bailey who directs business and culture transformation here at Harvard Business Publishing will also be part of the conversation. Ellen has successfully sold a lot of issues in her career and she'll recount those experiences. I've seen her in action and trust me you're in for a treat. I'm Amy Bernstein Get in touch with me and the rest of the show team by emailing women at work at hbr.org.